Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 15 of 15

Thread: 6x9 vs. 4x5 In todays digital world?

  1. #11

    Join Date
    Sep 1999
    Posts
    114

    6x9 vs. 4x5 In todays digital world?

    Glenn,

    Thank you for your insights into your use of the 6x9 Arca Swiss. Obviously from your point of view the 6x9 works well for your type of working style.

    My point in this thread was to solicit objective and varied opinions. I believe that I will not give up 4x5 as I love the shooting style that I have developed with it. Additionally, with the introduction of the new single sheet T-Max 100 Readyloads (my film of choice since Tri-X is not available in Readyloads)I have been getting excellent exposures without light leaks.

    So my point was to ascertain if shooting 4x5 vs 6x9 with todays film emulsions and digital workflow will allow comparable results with image enlargements of a reasonable size (perhaps up to 20x30). Your opinions regarding this point are very helpful and appreciated.

    To elaboorate; I recently shot 5 rolls of Agfa Scala on my Contax 645. I drum scanned a number of these images and I was quite taken and impressed with the results. Tonal range, detail, sharpness was all excellent. I print to 20x24 on my Epson 7000 and found the difference between 4x5 T-Max and the 645 Scala to be subtle and difficult to detect visually. So I would think that the difference between 4x5 and 6x9 might be evel less so.

    Thanks all for the great response and gamut of opinion.

    Mike

  2. #12

    Join Date
    Mar 1998
    Posts
    1,972

    6x9 vs. 4x5 In todays digital world?

    Don't forget that you'll need at least one new wide angle lens to take in the angle of view you are currently getting with your widest lens on 4x5

  3. #13

    Join Date
    Jan 1999
    Posts
    94

    6x9 vs. 4x5 In todays digital world?

    I'm excited to see how well the new Minolta Dimage Scan Multi Pro (4800 dpi, 4.8 dmax) with ICE3 will compare with the best drum scanners. If so, then switching to 6x9 would make lots of sense.

  4. #14

    6x9 vs. 4x5 In todays digital world?

    For what it's worth, I feel (in a view camera), 4x5 is easier to use than 6x9, simply because the movements are easier to judge on the ground glass (because the image is larger) and a given amount of movement (in degrees) creates a bigger arc (in inches or mm) at the lensboard or back.

  5. #15

    6x9 vs. 4x5 In todays digital world?

    Leaving aside all the personal preferences and technical arguments - and I'm not suggesting that they are not valid - I will be sticking with 5"x4" for the forseeable future, because all of my work is commercial and many of my commercial clients are advised by their printers that their jobs should be shot on 5"x4".

Similar Threads

  1. Exp., Dev. and Visualization in a scanning world.
    By Kirk Gittings in forum Digital Hardware
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 6-Jan-2005, 23:45
  2. World Record for Large Format Photography
    By Paul Metcalf in forum Cameras & Camera Accessories
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 11-Oct-2004, 20:57
  3. Lovely website, pictures of mourning around the world
    By Sandy Sorlien in forum On Photography
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 25-Sep-2001, 17:03

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •