the whole utah bit was a bit much, even for me.

But minus that. This situation at emulsion is a bit ridiculous. The thing that really amazes me more than the magazine actions (or lack there of), is the astounding level of latitude given by the photographic community towards the lackluster actions of the emulsion staff/volunteers/owners/etc.
I admire them for putting it out there and starting up a photo rag for the traditional photo world, but at some point they (emulsion) must have realized that they'd bit off more than they could reasonably chew.
Tell the supporters/subscribers that. Admit it. I don't think anyone would fault them. Magazines are not easy to start, they aren't easy to continually put out, and they aren't easy to continually run. I know this from multiple personal and business experiences.

Don't know about anyone else, but photography eats up enough income, and I'd have prefered to donate my money to a local art program.
Like clay said, I could have at least made that tax deductible.