Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 20

Thread: Cheap lens with huge coverage--does it exist?

  1. #1

    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Washington, D.C.
    Posts
    1,498

    Cheap lens with huge coverage--does it exist?

    I recently got some big rolls of 5" wide aerial film in a package deal and was thinking about making a 5x24 camera from black foam core. Is there anything such as a cheap lens that would cover 5x24? Any focal length is fine, I don't need a shutter-and I don't expect wonderful optical quality. Is there some unloved dog of a process lens that might fit the bill? Is it possible to build a crude 2-element lens that would cover?

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    1,794

    Re: Cheap lens with huge coverage--does it exist?

    What's the IC over 600mm?

    I once got a Brown 19" process lens for almost nothing. It's not long enough if you want to focus at infinity. But the thing is heavier then the anchor on your average cruise ship. I wonder if you could find a 24" focal length? Or go shorter and focus closer then infinity.

    But these aren't the sort of lenses for light weight cameras.

    Nothing wrong with the glass or the performance. IIRC the real maker was a large US firm with much sought after lenses.

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Gulfport, MS, USA
    Posts
    873

    Re: Cheap lens with huge coverage--does it exist?

    Barry, your best bet for a low-cost lens with that kind of coverage probably lies in process lenses. Mostly in barrel, these lenses were used mostly by printers such as newspapers, etc., and are often now found at bargain prices. The process cameras they were used on were often real "beasts" that filled an 8' x 10' room and took 24" to 30" litho films.

  4. #4

    Re: Cheap lens with huge coverage--does it exist?

    You need a nominal IC of ~622mm. The recently discussed 21.25" Copying Ektanon might do it, and they’re cheap.

  5. #5
    In the desert...
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Nevada/N.Arizona/ Florida Keys
    Posts
    613

    Re: Cheap lens with huge coverage--does it exist?

    Pin hole lens would also be nice, 10 inch focal length should cover. I think the front lens from some binoculars would cover, single element.

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Washington, D.C.
    Posts
    1,498

    Re: Cheap lens with huge coverage--does it exist?

    Thanks Nick. Beggars can't be choosers, so a heavy lens would be ok. It's not like I plan to go hiking with this beast. Being able to focus at infinity would be nice, but if I could get close that would be ok.

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    963

    Re: Cheap lens with huge coverage--does it exist?

    Quote Originally Posted by BarryS View Post
    I recently got some big rolls of 5" wide aerial film in a package deal and was thinking about making a 5x24 camera from black foam core.
    Are you sure not 5X14? I like to see you beat Jim's only 5X14 camera in the world.

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Washington, D.C.
    Posts
    1,498

    Re: Cheap lens with huge coverage--does it exist?

    Ok, thanks for the suggestions--it sounds like some of those process lenses would be perfect. Just have to snag a cheap one somewhere.

    Songyun-- Hey, this will beat Jim's 5x14--at least by size. I'd definitely accept his Chamonix in exchange if he wants to "move up".

  9. #9

    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    963

    Re: Cheap lens with huge coverage--does it exist?

    Quote Originally Posted by BarryS View Post

    Songyun-- Hey, this will beat Jim's 5x14--at least by size. I'd definitely accept his Chamonix in exchange if he wants to "move up".
    5X24 is way too long for my taste. You must have your special project, please keep us updated with your project and don't forget show us the photos you take with this camera.

  10. #10
    Zebra
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Asheville, NC
    Posts
    565

    Re: Cheap lens with huge coverage--does it exist?

    Barry,

    I have a Nikkor (750 Process lens) that I bought for my 20 x 24 that would cover that I paid 500$ for--I would let it go at some loss, how much we would have to discuss if you need one soon.

    let me know. I'm not that hot to sell it so no worries if you aren't interested.

    Good luck with however it pans out.

    Monty

Similar Threads

  1. What is a Wide Lens for 14x17 besides Dagor?
    By rknewcomb in forum Cameras & Camera Accessories
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 9-Apr-2008, 19:46
  2. Lens Coverage Test for 16x20 Hyperfocal Camera
    By Michael Heald in forum Cameras & Camera Accessories
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 19-Dec-2005, 09:01
  3. Need cheap moderatly wide field lens for 5x7 2d
    By Mark_3632 in forum Cameras & Camera Accessories
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 21-Oct-2003, 20:54
  4. Replies: 11
    Last Post: 2-Jan-2002, 22:22
  5. Which lens has the largest coverage?
    By James Bond in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 8-Sep-1998, 16:06

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •