Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Kodak PLUS-X Aerographic Film 2402

  1. #1

    Kodak PLUS-X Aerographic Film 2402

    Anyone using this film for non-aerial uses? Can you tell me equivalent ISO for metering purposes? The kodak website lists the ISO-A of 200, is there a conversion to land based ISO? What about processing the film? Developer, time, temp? Any info would be awesome.

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    San Joaquin Valley, California
    Posts
    9,603

    Re: Kodak PLUS-X Aerographic Film 2402

    This according to MR FOTO:

    ISO 125 small rolls in short lengths up to 5-1/2' with agitation at 30 second intervals
    d-76 (1:1) 6.5 min. @70 deg F
    HC-110 (dil B) 4.5 min. @ 70 deg F
    Microdol X (1:3) 11 min. @ 70 deg. F

    For large film tanks, roll or sheet with agitation at 1 min. intervals
    d-76 (1:1) 8 min. @ 70 deg F
    Microdol X (1:3) 14 min. @ 70 deg. F
    HC-110 (dil B) 5 min.@ 70 deg. F

    For sheets in trays with cotinuous agitation
    d-76 5.75min. @ 70 deg. F
    HC-110 4 min. @70 deg. F
    Microdol X 4min. @ 70 deg. F

    Dev. times less than 5 minutes should be avoided

    I hope that helps!
    "I would feel more optimistic about a bright future for man if he spent less time proving that he can outwit Nature and more time tasting her sweetness and respecting her seniority"---EB White

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    13 Critchley Avenue, PO Box 36, Monteith Ont, P0K1P0
    Posts
    51

    Re: Kodak PLUS-X Aerographic Film 2402

    I'm cutting my 9.5"x125' rolls down to 9.5"x8" and using it as 8"x10" (with the curl into the emulsion it is stiff enough to stay flat in the holder without falling out).

    I'm rating mine at ISO25.

    I develop mine in D-D23, 5 minutes in "A" and 4 minutes in "B" for contact printing on AZO. This gives me print exposure times of 60 to 90 seconds under a 10W halogen light at about 24"-30".

    cheers

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    CA Central Coast
    Posts
    613

    Re: Kodak PLUS-X Aerographic Film 2402

    I have not found an ISOA to ISO equivalence.
    But I did examine the Kodak tech sheets for contrast index. Aerial CIs are 2-3x pictorial CIs and EI is affected inversely- 1/3 to 1/2- when development is cut to reduce CI. My experience is with cut down film in ancient cameras, so who can tell what the actual shutter speeds were, but I found that "EI" of 100 or so seemed to work adequately. EI 25-125 as a start should get you close for a second try, depending on everything else :>)

  5. #5

    Re: Kodak PLUS-X Aerographic Film 2402

    I use an EI of 25 in D76 1+1 for about 8-9min @ 68F. It seems to work well most of the time. I usually use this film with my barrel lenses and my exposure times are very imprecise.

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Dec 2000
    Location
    Tonopah, Nevada, USA
    Posts
    6,334

    Re: Kodak PLUS-X Aerographic Film 2402

    I rate mine at 125 just like any other plus X. Ignorance is bliss. Where it deviates wildly is if you use red filters. It's a lot more red sensitive than ordinary Plus X.

Similar Threads

  1. Film Loading for Dummies
    By Jodi in forum Cameras & Camera Accessories
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 15-Sep-2006, 09:26
  2. Kodak Color Film Sales
    By Stpephen Willlard in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 20-Jan-2006, 11:38
  3. Depth of Field, Depth of Focus, and Film Flatness
    By steve simmons in forum Cameras & Camera Accessories
    Replies: 65
    Last Post: 7-Jan-2006, 19:30
  4. Kodak T-Max 100 5x7 Film Availability
    By Michael Kadillak in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 15-Mar-2002, 23:59
  5. uneven overdeveloped circles at the film edge with Kodak hangers
    By Jeff Liao in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 23-Feb-2002, 20:22

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •