Page 1 of 6 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 56

Thread: 7 Antique Soft Focus Portrait Lenses Compared

  1. #1

    Join Date
    Dec 2000
    Location
    Tonopah, Nevada, USA
    Posts
    6,334

    7 Antique Soft Focus Portrait Lenses Compared

    You know the drill...

    Some pretty exotic lenses on this one.

    Pinkham & Smith Series VI Synthetic 10"
    Pinkham & Smith Series IV Visual Quality 14"
    Hermagis Eidoscop #2 14.5"
    Hermagis Eidoscop #1 19"
    Gundlach Achromatic Meniscus 18"
    Puligny Anachromatique 15"
    Voigtlander Portrait Euryscop Series II #6

    My idea was to just use a single set up in order to try to see nuances of differences. I've imbedded high res images behind the ones that come up quickly. Click on the images to get a higher res version. That's where you can see some differences. The Voigtlander lens is not a true soft focus lens. It is a Rapid Rect. and is sharper than the others.

    I hope some will enjoy this. I know most of you prefer sharp pictures, but there are a few of us interested in the fuzzy pictures too.

    http://tonopahpictures.0catch.com/Ja...it_Lenses.html

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Rondo, Missouri
    Posts
    2,126

    Re: 7 Antique Soft Focus Portrait Lenses Compared

    You know, if you clean all the crap out of those boots, they'll be a lot more comfortable to wear.

    That being said, I love the effect of that 19" Eido-whatever. That one is my favorite.
    Michael W. Graves
    Michael's Pub

    If it ain't broke....don't fix it!

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Whittier, CA
    Posts
    1,138

    Re: 7 Antique Soft Focus Portrait Lenses Compared

    It is a Rapid Rect?

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Dec 2000
    Location
    Tonopah, Nevada, USA
    Posts
    6,334

    Re: 7 Antique Soft Focus Portrait Lenses Compared

    Quote Originally Posted by domenico Foschi View Post
    It is a Rapid Rect?

    PS Series IV, Eidoscop, and Voigtlander are all iterations of Rapid Rectilinear but the first 2 have the softness designed in on purpose through non-corrections. The Voigtlander is just a sharp RR but with a nice big aperture. I think it's about an f4.

  5. #5

    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Gresham OR
    Posts
    1,374

    Re: 7 Antique Soft Focus Portrait Lenses Compared

    Thanks for posting these Jim.
    Fuzzy is good when we can choose as an option

    That Hermagis Eidoscop #1 19" is sweet.

  6. #6

    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    1,824

    Re: 7 Antique Soft Focus Portrait Lenses Compared

    Jim,

    That Hermagis Endoscop 19" should be No. 2, while the 14.5" should be No.1.

    I like the Endoscop 19" too and I also like the P$S 14".

    Thanks.

    Hugo

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Dec 2000
    Location
    Tonopah, Nevada, USA
    Posts
    6,334

    Re: 7 Antique Soft Focus Portrait Lenses Compared

    Quote Originally Posted by Hugo Zhang View Post
    Jim,

    That Hermagis Endoscop 19" should be No. 2, while the 14.5" should be No.1.

    I like the Endoscop 19" too and I also like the P$S 14".

    Thanks.

    Hugo
    Hugo, an endoscop is what the doctor shoves up.......oh never mind. Trust me, you don't want to go there with the 19" Eidoscop.

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Cleveland, Ohio
    Posts
    73

    Re: 7 Antique Soft Focus Portrait Lenses Compared

    Jim,
    You don't mention what format size was used in your tests. Won't that make a difference?

    Dave

  9. #9

    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    954

    Re: 7 Antique Soft Focus Portrait Lenses Compared

    There seems to be a ghost of the front of a boot behind the primary boot. Is that a second shoe or something else?

  10. #10

    Join Date
    Dec 2000
    Location
    Tonopah, Nevada, USA
    Posts
    6,334

    Re: 7 Antique Soft Focus Portrait Lenses Compared

    Quote Originally Posted by Toyon View Post
    There seems to be a ghost of the front of a boot behind the primary boot. Is that a second shoe or something else?
    Quote Originally Posted by panchro-press
    Jim,
    You don't mention what format size was used in your tests. Won't that make a difference? Dave
    Thanks. There is a second boot back there, and the format on all is 8X10. Yes, that would make a huge difference. Jim

Similar Threads

  1. Soft Focus lens users
    By steve simmons in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 21-Jan-2005, 09:33
  2. Soft focus lenses
    By Mike Lopez in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 7-Dec-2004, 14:57
  3. Vintage Soft Focus Lenses
    By Steve_571 in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 13-Apr-2000, 12:57
  4. Focus distance needed for lenses
    By Rusty Johnston in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 5-Apr-2000, 21:23
  5. Prints out of focus
    By Tim Kimbler in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 4-Jun-1998, 14:41

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •