Any comments on this lens? The one I got seems to date from the seventies (# 12. ..). I bought it for portrait in the studio a.o., but it seems a bit too soft. A ny experiences with this lens?
Any comments on this lens? The one I got seems to date from the seventies (# 12. ..). I bought it for portrait in the studio a.o., but it seems a bit too soft. A ny experiences with this lens?
A Symmar-S lens should be very sharp. I have the same lens, and I get sharp results from it. Being too soft for portraits, you obviously have a problem somewhere. Perhaps you might get your lens checked on an optical bench. I think that S.K.Grimes does this. How 'bout a problem other than the lens? Have you used the same camera w/other lenses and obtained sharp results? Are both the camera and the lens new?
Thanks for your reaction, Neil. My first impression was based on an expired Polaroid. Now I've got results with Tri-X in HC110. It is sharp enough indeed, but when you come from an APO-Symmar the contrast is quite different. The Symmar-S is much softer and this may give less sharpness-impresion. For portrait it seems very suitable, and the highlights seems easier to control.
Bookmarks