The Mods also allow any format in the CORRECT category
Tin Can
Last edited by Vaughn; 13-Apr-2022 at 15:55.
"Landscapes exist in the material world yet soar in the realms of the spirit..." Tsung Ping, 5th Century China
I always thought that LF started at 4x5. That's 4x5 film. Shoot it in a shoe box, with a pin hole. It's LF. I do love that 6x9 negative I get with my Grand Dad's old Brownie Six-20!
YouTube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/user/andy8x10
Flickr Site: https://www.flickr.com/photos/62974341@N02/
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/andrew.oneill.artist/
I don't mind the subject of roll-film backs being combined with large format gear discussions; sometimes I need to carry both conventional holders and a roll-film back or two for the same 4x5 camera. But I can't realistically consider the result to be in the same category, especially once I get in the darkroom. So I'm fine with the formal forum distinction between the two, yet at the same time, allowing certain provisions for relevant comparisons and cross-applications.
I used to chuckle walking past a particular gallery in Carmel advertising big color prints from "GIANT Large Format" Hasselblad film shots.
Bookmarks