Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Considering panoramic camera

  1. #1

    Considering panoramic camera

    Hi all,
    I have been considerinig getting a panaoramic camera, like the Gaoersi, which is in my price range. What I am not sure of is which lens adaptor to choose. I am thinking of the 6x12 model. However, how can I have an idea of the difference between what kind of image a 75 mm lens would produce, versus, say a 150 mm lens?

    Also, I have been checking other posts about the Gaoersi cameras, and the problems with getting the lens adaptor to focus properly, and I am not sure which lens would result in the least amount of dificulty with regard to calibration.

    I own the following lenses:

    75 mm Schnieder 1:8 SA
    90 mm Rodenstock Grandagon 1:4.5
    120 mm Schneider APO-Symmar 1:5.6
    135 mm Apo-Sironar-S 1:5.6
    150 mm Sironar-N 1:5.6

    What lens adaptor do you recommend I start with?

    Fred

  2. #2
    Whatever David A. Goldfarb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2000
    Location
    Honolulu, Hawai'i
    Posts
    4,658

    Re: Considering panoramic camera

    What would be the attraction of such a camera over a 6x12 back for your 4x5" camera?

  3. #3
    Greg Lockrey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Temperance, MI
    Posts
    1,980

    Re: Considering panoramic camera

    I personnaly went with the 6x17 adapter back for my 4x5's. I can get 6x9, 6x12, 6x15,and 6x17 with it using the masks. I even have a set up for my Graphlex to do hand holds but I am limited to only the 150 mm though. To use my 90mm, I use my Sinar. It's a lot cheaper for starting out too. The brand I got is the Da Yi and they run about $450.
    Greg Lockrey

    Wealth is a state of mind.
    Money is just a tool.
    Happiness is pedaling +25mph on a smooth road.



  4. #4
    Jack Flesher's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Los Altos, CA
    Posts
    1,071

    Re: Considering panoramic camera

    I agree with David... For a trial, why not just shoot on 4x5 and crop it down to 6x12 after the fact? This for sure is more expensive per shot, but you get to adjust rise/fall after the fact If you find you *love* the pano format, then look into a dedicated 612 or 617 back or camera.

    My measly .02,
    Jack Flesher

    www.getdpi.com

  5. #5

    Re: Considering panoramic camera

    Quote Originally Posted by David A. Goldfarb View Post
    What would be the attraction of such a camera over a 6x12 back for your 4x5" camera?
    The smaller size of the camera would be an attraction to me. Carrying less baggage also. In addition, using 120 roll film would be less expensive that cropping the 4x5 negatives. However, a 6x17 back for my camera is also an option to consider.

    Fred

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Ann Arbor, MI USA
    Posts
    219

    Re: Considering panoramic camera

    How about cutting a GG mask to see which view you like the best? Or trial shots with cropping or a panoramic dark slide? You are the best judge.

  7. #7
    Whatever David A. Goldfarb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2000
    Location
    Honolulu, Hawai'i
    Posts
    4,658

    Re: Considering panoramic camera

    I also have the DaYi 6x17 back and it should work with all your lenses (75-150mm).

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    New Berlin, Wi
    Posts
    1,354

    Re: Considering panoramic camera

    I have the Shen Hao 6x17 back and have dedicated an Ebony 45s camera and a Super Symmar 150 XL to it, a marvelous setup. I can do vertical and landscape aspect and cannot exceed the lens with movements..Evan Clarke

  9. #9

    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Fort Worth, Texas
    Posts
    37

    Re: Considering panoramic camera

    Fred,

    I have an Art Panorama 7x17 I bought many years ago. The advantages I see of a separate camera is, as you stated the roll film and the fact that you are no longer working with a view camera. I love view cameras. Mostly I work with a 5x7 and 8x10 but it is a very different mental process. Sometimes I just want to carry a camera on a smaller tripod and a light meter. I take many more photographs using this set-up. I try more options.

    I have been looking at the Gaoersi 6x12. The idea of two squares next to each other as a compositional model looks like a good challenge. I would be interested, if you get one, how it works out for you.

    Luther

  10. #10
    Seattle photographer Photomax's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    135

    Re: Considering panoramic camera

    I have the Gaoersi 6x17 which allows you to quickly switch between 6x17, 6x15, 6x12. Its a pretty cool camera once you have the correct lens barrel and calibration figured out. A better made option would be the Fotoman 6x17 cameras. Same basic design as the Gaoersi but they look better made IMHO.

    Max

Similar Threads

  1. What Kind of Camera? (Finding Camera Manufacturers)
    By cblurton in forum Cameras & Camera Accessories
    Replies: 32
    Last Post: 26-Nov-2006, 22:56
  2. Portrait perspective: Quiz and two questions
    By Jerry Fusselman in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 88
    Last Post: 5-Jun-2006, 17:57
  3. Another victim - AGFA in Chapter 11
    By Juergen Sattler in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 29-May-2005, 03:11
  4. Focusing Knob on TK45S
    By Scott Rosenberg in forum Cameras & Camera Accessories
    Replies: 52
    Last Post: 15-Mar-2005, 22:19
  5. Arca-Swiss or Shen-Hao
    By darren in forum Cameras & Camera Accessories
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 2-Aug-2004, 07:30

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •