Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 12

Thread: Xenar 3.5 15cm - type D or not?

  1. #1
    4x5 - no beard Patrik Roseen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Stockholm, SWEDEN
    Posts
    532

    Xenar 3.5 15cm - type D or not?

    Hi,
    when searching through previous threads looking for information about the Xenar 3.5/15 cm lens, I found postings referring to Tessar formula and something called Type-D.

    Could someone please explain what Type-D is and if all Xenar 3.5/15cm are Type-D or if there are variations...such as when did they start/stop being Type-Ds.

    I recently bought one made in the mid 1940's and is hoping to use it for nice 'old looking' portraits.

  2. #2

    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Munich
    Posts
    77

    Re: Xenar 3.5 15cm - type D or not?

    Patrik,
    Hartmut Thiele in "Deutsche Photooptik von A -Z", 2007, lists three F 3.5 Xenar types in ranges that may or may not include your specific focal length:
    3.5 Xenar f 50>300mm with cemented group in front, introduced 1929
    3.5 Xenar f 50>300mm with cemented group behind, intoduced 1934
    3.5 - 4 Xenar Typ D, 105>180mm, a 3 -3 triplet, introduced 1926.

    If your lens is a "normal" Xenar (cemented group behind) you might be surprised how fresh (not old) your photos will look.

    Uli

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    8,484

    Re: Xenar 3.5 15cm - type D or not?

    Patrik, "old" looking portraits were shot on old (not aged) film and printed on old (not aged) paper. Most lenses from the '40s, really wide angle lenses excepted, shoot like modern lenses. IMO, the keys to the "old" look are emulsions and processing.

  4. #4
    All metric sizes to 24x30 Ole Tjugen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    3,383

    Re: Xenar 3.5 15cm - type D or not?

    To muddy the waters a little, my 15cm f:3,5 Xenar Typ D has the cemented group in front and an air-spaced group with negative (total) focal length behind the aperture. Definitely not a 3-3 triplet, nor a Tessar.

    Mid-1940's is a bit too late for the Typ D, I think.

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Devon, South West England
    Posts
    26

    Re: Xenar 3.5 15cm - type D or not?

    Hi Patrik
    I have a 'quote' Xenar Typ.D.f:3.5 F - 15cm, mounted in a dial set Compur shutter. The lens dates from 1926. The LVM describes it as a reverse Tessar, 2 cemented elements in front and 2 air spaced behind. A previous owner must have thought that it was a good lens as it has a nice purple coating. It is not supposed to cover more than 6x9 but I have shot 5x4 with it and putting it on the 5x7 it seems to cover that as well. I have yet to take any pix on 5x7. As Ole says I think Type Ds were only made in the 1920s. Tessars are nice lenses, have fun.
    Alex

  6. #6

    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Munich
    Posts
    77

    Re: Xenar 3.5 15cm - type D or not?

    Ole,
    the first Xenar series I mentioned (by quoting Thiele) has or had a cemented group in front. Would you exclude that some or all of these Xenars got a "D" after the name ( and not only the 3-3 triplet)? Or do you say, Thile is wrong here. I know him a bit and can assure you that he is quite open to correct errors. I haven't found many up to now, BTW.

    As far as I know there were more triplets of this front doublet type. To mention just two: Westanar by Isco (=Schneider) and Culminar by Steinheil. Apparently the basic triplet design allowed many variations inasmuch as more importance is given to speed and definition than to covering power.

    Cheers
    Uli

  7. #7
    All metric sizes to 24x30 Ole Tjugen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    3,383

    Re: Xenar 3.5 15cm - type D or not?

    Uli,
    All I'm really certain of is that my Typ D is clearly marked as such on the outside of the front cell, and last I checked I was convinced there is a faint "internal" reflection in the front cell. From what little I know of lens making (and naming) at that time, one sample is too little to suggest corrections.

    I know that the Vade Mecum also calls it a triplet, but I don't really consider the VM "authoritative" on German optics.

    As an aside, would Herr Thiele possibly know anything about a Schneider Göttingen Aerotar 50cm f:5.5? Schneider know nothing, and ISCO can only confirm that the serial number corresponds to their production year 1944... It seems to be an "advanced triplet", possibly a 3+3+2, but with this many elements it's difficult to be certain.

  8. #8

    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Munich
    Posts
    77

    Re: Xenar 3.5 15cm - type D or not?

    There is a 4.5/ 500cm Aerotar listed in his book ( mentioned above); made by ISCO ( that is Schneider Göttingen) , introduced 1943, and characterized as a "Fliegerkamera". No design specs given. But as Thiele, whenever possible ,goes back to primary sources - patents, correspondence, "Firmenschriften", I'm almost certain he knows how it is built.

  9. #9
    All metric sizes to 24x30 Ole Tjugen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    3,383

    Re: Xenar 3.5 15cm - type D or not?

    I too have found references to the f:4,5 Aerotar - but mine is a f:5,5.

    It weighs about half a ton (3-4 kg? I don't have a balance in that range), and has a bayonet-locking yellow filter. I mat be able to mount it on a "Reisekamera", but nothing else is solid enough to support it (short of an airplane).

  10. #10

    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Munich
    Posts
    77

    Re: Xenar 3.5 15cm - type D or not?

    Ole,
    my dictionary tells me: Aerotar is synonymous with aerobics.

Similar Threads

  1. 210mm f 3.5 Schneider Xenar - 1951 vintage: sharp?
    By tor kviljo in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 15-Mar-2019, 06:44
  2. Schneider APO Tele Xenar 600/800mm Convertible
    By Eric Leppanen in forum Cameras & Camera Accessories
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 6-Nov-2005, 22:43
  3. Bokeh, and Tessar type lenses
    By Hening Bettermann in forum Cameras & Camera Accessories
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 7-May-2005, 01:57
  4. Schneider Xenar 135mm f/4.7, A Good Lens?
    By Tarn Tantikij in forum Cameras & Camera Accessories
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 12-Mar-2002, 21:53
  5. use of type 55
    By mo in forum Digital Hardware
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 23-Jul-2001, 06:45

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •