Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Kaesemann Polarizer: Defective or Not?

  1. #1

    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Minneapolis, MN
    Posts
    159

    Kaesemann Polarizer: Defective or Not?

    I just took delivery of a new B+W Kaesemann polarizer filter. Upon closer inspection, I noticed several apparent bubbles in the polarizer foil. These bubbles are rather small in size, no more than a few millimeters each. Should I be concerned? Is this normal/acceptable? Should I return the new filter while I can?

    I have another B+W Kaesemann, in a smaller size, which has one of these bubbles as well. I never noticed it until quite recently, and it has no apparent ill effects on images made with it so far...

    Any insight is appreciated! Thanks!

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    280

    Re: Kaesemann Polarizer: Defective or Not?

    You bought it new. You paid a reasonable price for it. If you don't do anything now, the bubbles will bug you for the entire time you own it. Bubbles don't belong in optical elements-they do not make things work better. Why not replace it? You did not buy it on Ebay where the calculation one does about keeping defective items is moderated by the purchasing price one got which is less than the new price of an item. Have I told you anything you did not already know?
    Cheers,
    Dave B.

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Minneapolis, MN
    Posts
    159

    Talking Re: Kaesemann Polarizer: Defective or Not?

    Uhh, no? No need to condescend, I was just wondering if these thing are just like that.

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    280

    Re: Kaesemann Polarizer: Defective or Not?

    LB:
    I am sorry for appearing to be rude. I was trying to be sardonic. My main point is that you will derive more satisfaction from having something that is perfect which is what you paid for.
    Best wishes,
    Dave B.

  5. #5
    Greg Lockrey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Temperance, MI
    Posts
    1,980

    Re: Kaesemann Polarizer: Defective or Not?

    I had a similar issue with a B&W Kaesemann polarizer that I bought from B&H and the gladly replaced it for me. B&W's are supposed to be among the best, but I'm getting to wonder about their QC department.
    Greg Lockrey

    Wealth is a state of mind.
    Money is just a tool.
    Happiness is pedaling +25mph on a smooth road.



  6. #6

    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Minneapolis, MN
    Posts
    159

    Re: Kaesemann Polarizer: Defective or Not?

    NP, Davy B. I am arranging for an RMA. Poop.

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Harbor City, California
    Posts
    1,750

    Re: Kaesemann Polarizer: Defective or Not?

    Bubbles used to occur quite regularly in old lenses, even from the best makers. Optically, they just block an insignificant amount of light.

    I don't know anything about Kaesemann polarizer's and am surprised to find that the polarizing element is thick enough to have bubbles of several millimeters size. I am wondering if they are something other than real bubbles. If, however, bubbles is what they actually are, I would expect them to be harmless.

  8. #8
    Greg Lockrey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Temperance, MI
    Posts
    1,980

    Re: Kaesemann Polarizer: Defective or Not?

    What I had in the filter that I recieved was that the polarizing film in between the two pieces of glass had definite wrinkles on the film. The bubbles I noticed were more of seperation from the glass as if there was too much glass seperation from the film. Probably had no real effect but it looked like hell.
    Greg Lockrey

    Wealth is a state of mind.
    Money is just a tool.
    Happiness is pedaling +25mph on a smooth road.



  9. #9
    Whatever David A. Goldfarb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2000
    Location
    Honolulu, Hawai'i
    Posts
    4,658

    Re: Kaesemann Polarizer: Defective or Not?

    Given the cost of these things, you're paying for perfection and you should receive it. Otherwise, why spend extra on a Kaesemann?

  10. #10
    Jack Flesher's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Los Altos, CA
    Posts
    1,071

    Re: Kaesemann Polarizer: Defective or Not?

    The whole point of a Kaesemann polarizer is that the edge is hermetically sealed so the Polaroid film in the middle of the glass "sandwich" does not deteriorate over time due to humidity. The fact that yours bubbled probably indicates something went wrong after the fact -- like the filter got very overheated or the edge seal is defective.
    Jack Flesher

    www.getdpi.com

Similar Threads

  1. Center filter + Polarizer on WA lens
    By QT Luong in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 18-Sep-2007, 15:18
  2. Eliminating Glare and B&W Film: Polarizer vs Red Filter?
    By Michael Heald in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 12-Feb-2007, 11:00
  3. drop-in rotating polarizer on Lee system
    By Karl Amo in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 16-Sep-2004, 17:54
  4. Metering with Polarizer filters
    By Thomas Ferko in forum Style & Technique
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 6-Apr-1998, 12:04

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •