Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 30

Thread: ONE Lens for everything

  1. #1

    ONE Lens for everything

    If you had to only have ONE lens what would it be? You had to shoot everything with it; Portraits, Tabletop, Landscapes and Interiors. I am wondering what wo uld it be? Would the movements in Large Format be enough to deal with the limit ations of one lens and fit everything in like a wide angle lens? Would cropping a big large format negative be enough to get a telephoto effect? Do you REALLY need all those lenses?

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Sep 1999
    Posts
    449

    ONE Lens for everything

    No question for me. 135mm on 4x5 (equiv. of 40.5mm in 35mm). How about two lenses only? 90mm and 150/162mm. For three, just add a 250mm. Picking the focal lengths is easy, specifying exactly which lens is a lot harder. Dagors are hard to beat, all 'round.

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Apr 2000
    Posts
    149

    ONE Lens for everything

    I favor an old 120mm Schneider Angulon--very compact, reasonably sharp.

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Nov 1999
    Posts
    740

    ONE Lens for everything

    David, IMHO you would be hard pressed to find a better all round lens than the Schneider 110 XL !!

  5. #5

    ONE Lens for everything

    Gotta go with Bill on this one. 135mm is best for one all around lens. Second choice is 150. Can't go real wide, but fits the other criteria the closest. Would add 90mm and 250 next, in that order. Many old photographers never owned but a 135 for their Graphics and got by.

  6. #6

    ONE Lens for everything

    David,

    For the first couple of years I worked in 4x5, I only used a 210mm 5.6 Symmar-S and a 90mm f8 Super Angulon. Come to think of it, I really don't believe I gained that much--except weight, bulk and expense--by adding a bunch of other focal lengths over the years.

    Good luck, Sergio.

  7. #7

    ONE Lens for everything

    For 8x10, first choice: 270mm. Second choice: 450mm.

  8. #8

    ONE Lens for everything

    David:

    It is less important on 4x5. I most commonly use a 210. But I use an enlarger. More important for 8x10 which I contact. There, I use a 300.

    Grego

  9. #9

    ONE Lens for everything

    Well, it may be cheating but David did say "one lens" so I'd vote for a triple convertible. That's sort of cheating too because that's what I have.

    Weston had his 12/21/28 - but decided to add a 19" Protar - maybe he'd have been happy with the T.R. 12/19.7/25"?

    Joel Meyerowitz got/gets along just fine with his 10" W.F. Ektar.

  10. #10

    ONE Lens for everything

    p.s.

    I just remembered I have an article from a pro-oriented magazine in which a fella relates starting out in L.F. with just one lens - a 120 Super Angulon. His camera was the 5 X 7 Deardorff - so he could shoot 5 X 7, 4 X 5, and all the 120 sizes with one lens - and apparently got along o.k.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •