Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Why Caltars Suck

  1. #1

    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Posts
    9,487

    Why Caltars Suck

    Because even when you put them in a mint $275+ value shutter, you still can't get $100 for them even if they are the modern multicoated version and cover 8x10.

    http://www.largeformatphotography.in...ad.php?t=21664

    Please prove me wrong.

  2. #2
    Sheldon N's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Portland, OR
    Posts
    605

    Re: Why Caltars Suck

    Frank -

    If you put it on ebay, don't let it go as a no-reserve auction. I did that with my Caltar 240mm and only got $235. Try setting it up as a Buy-it-Now for $350 and you'll eventually get a taker.

    Remember, all the folks here already have their Fuji 240mm A or 12" Wide Field Ektars so Ebay may actually be a better marketplace for your lens.

  3. #3

    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Westminster, MD
    Posts
    1,653

    Re: Why Caltars Suck

    Frank, if you want to give it away . . . grin.

    Still need a bellows? I got a beater Crown Graphic coming in for parts. I'll let you know how good the bellows is when it gets here. About 4 or 5 days.

  4. #4
    Dave Karp
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Posts
    2,960

    Re: Why Caltars Suck

    Sorry for your difficulty in selling Frank. The flip side for buyers is that this is why the current Caltars are awesome. Excellent Rodenstock glass for a great price.

    Maybe it will sell now that the holidays are over and everyone is done shopping. Or when tax returns start coming in.

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    God's Country
    Posts
    2,080

    Re: Why Caltars Suck

    Frank,

    Some times, it's just a cyclical thing... lenses seem to be increasing in price of late!

    BTW, is it one of the modern black shutters?

    Good luck on selling it!

    Cheers
    Life in the fast lane!

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Posts
    9,487

    Re: Why Caltars Suck

    yeah, the latest shutter - thanks

  7. #7
    Is that a Hassleblad? Brian Vuillemenot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Marin County, California
    Posts
    837

    Re: Why Caltars Suck

    They may suck for the seller, but they're great for the buyer. I just got a mint 210 on the auction site for $205, less than one fourth of the new price for an Apo-Sironar-N...
    Brian Vuillemenot

  8. #8
    Confidently Agnostic!
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Victoria BC
    Posts
    1,062

    Re: Why Caltars Suck

    Yeah.

    I got a Grandagon-N 90 f/6.8 and an apo-sironar N 210 f/5.6 together in basically mint condition for less than the cost of one of those lenses used, had they been stamped "rodenstock".

    I didn't buy them planning to resell them, but if I do it's a fair long term rental price anyway. Sucks to be someone who bought one new and is now trying to resell, though given the ones I own are dated to around 1983 they've had a lot of good use over the years and probably have earned their keep. I didn't feel too bad for royally raping the sellers of these lenses on ebay

Similar Threads

  1. You suck film holder. (Vac.810 holder)
    By John Grunke in forum Gear
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 29-May-2002, 12:20
  2. Caltars and Rodenstocks
    By Brent Flint in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 1-Dec-2000, 21:43

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •