Shen Hao FCL-57-A

[merlo.luca1961@libero.it]

Has any of you ever used this camera ? What are your opinions about using iit with a 4x5 reducing back ?

[Ted Harris]

I 'played' briefly with the camera during the "Speed Date Your New Camera' workshop at the last View Camera Conference. I like the camera and it felt familiar to me because it is basically a 'knockoff of Dick Phillips' designs. Can't think of a single reason not to use it with a reducing back .... a very convenient way to cary around two formats. I do the same with my Canham 57T.

[Marko]

I am also thinking along the same lines, but how about weight?

[Ted Harris]

Well, at an advertised weight of 3 kg it is not a lightweight but then again it is not a lot heavier than some 4x5's out there. You an figure the additional back will not add more than another 500 grams tops and likely less. The only problem is that manufaturer's weights are more often under than over estimates. Having said that, I don't remember the camera feeling overly heavy, although my subjective impression was that it weighed more than my Canham 57 .... again all subjective.

[merlo.luca1961@libero.it]

Thanks to all of you. I think that a difference in weight of 0,5 - 1 kg is not so bad afterwards. Many people are only considering camera weights without thinking about lenses, film holders and ancillary equipment............

[Amund BLix Aaeng]

I use it with a reducing back(and the 5x7 back of course) and very pleased with it.
The camera weighs about the same as the HZX-45 I used to have.

[naturephoto1]

I use it with a reducing back(and the 5x7 back of course) and very pleased with it.
The camera weighs about the same as the HZX-45 I used to have.

Amund is being too modest. He has a thread on this camera with many great photos here on this forum:

http://www.largeformatphotography.in...ad.php?t=19657

Rich

[merlo.luca1961@libero.it]

Richard,

Amund is really too modest ! Congratulations to Amund for the review and for his camera. I am an happy owner of a Shen Hao 4x5 (with 90, 135, 150, 200, 300 and 450 mm lens) and I am in the market (see my other thread about monorails) for a camera that will allow me a longer bellow in the field and to do some botanicals. I have restricted the options to four options:

1) Second hand Sinar F2 with a adapter that will allow me to switch lenses with my Shen Hao.
2) Second hand Wisner Expedition as Ken suggested me but, as far as I know, there is no adapter to Linhof type boards.
3) Brand new Shen Hao 5x7 with reducing 4x5 board.
4) Brand new Ebony 45 SV ( ) (much more expensive than the previous options but a really good camera as far as could understand).
5) Equipping my 8x10 Wehman (that is already equipped with adapter to Linhof type boards) with an a a 4x5 reducing board. This option is the least expensive option but I fear that the camera equipped in this way could result too cumbersome to be used in the field for the 4x5 format.

Whish option would you select if you were me ?

[Marko]

Luca,

I agree with your thinking, using a 5x7 model of camera you already like is a nice way to have two formats for a very slightly higher price. I am about to buy my first field camera and one of my strong wishes if not requirements is also longer bellows.

I am currently deciding between a 4x5 Shen-Hao and a 5x7 Shen-Hao, although a different model, HZX57-IIAT. It's the second camera on this page. It looks very much like the same model in different format.

The only dealbreaker at this point might be the weight. The 5x7 version weighs 4 kg (almost 9 pounds), compared to 2.4 kg (about 5 pounds) for the 4x5. And those are manufacturer's figures, almost always on the optimistic side. Then come the film holders, the tripod and all the other things that support the selected format. Oh, and the conversion back too, in the case of 5x7.

Tough decision, especially for a non-professional.

[johnnydc]

Sorry for going OT, but can somebody tell me if the 4x5 reducing back for the Shen-Hao 5x7 can use 4x5 Graflok accessories?