Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 33

Thread: Screwed: Re-thinking the 355 G-Claron

  1. #1
    alec4444's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    New York City
    Posts
    655

    Screwed: Re-thinking the 355 G-Claron

    Well, as another 355mm G-Claron flies by on the bay, I can't help but wonder if one of these is going to be my first 11x14 lens. I bid on it...a fair bid I think, and notta. I had an opportunity to purchase one privately, and it was out of my budget. So now what?

    The 360mm Symmar S appears to be my safe 2nd choice. It's huge. It's heavy. It's multicoated. It's seemingly available and affordable. Other options include:

    --360mm Orbit S II, which is the same as the above (I think) in a generic wrapper.
    --15" APO Raptar force fed into an Ilex shutter
    --Rodenstock's 360mm lens, which seems to be the same price as the Symmar S with less coverage.
    --Nikon 360mm f/6.5 Nikkor-W
    --360mm Schneider Symmar (the convertable one, single coated I think)
    --Kodak 14" Commercial Ektar, though I think it just covers with no movements

    Whaddaya think?

    Uses: B&W, Architecture (need rise!) and landscape, 11x14 camera, contact prints, would prefer a shutter, may not have a compendium shade to start.

    --A

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Dec 1997
    Location
    Baraboo, Wisconsin
    Posts
    7,697

    Re: Screwed: Re-thinking the 355 G-Claron

    I think that considering the weight of your 11x14 camera, the added weight of the 360mm Symmar S will be insignificant. Carrying a heavy lens along with an 11x14 camera and acessories is analogous to lighting a match in Hell in terms of its effect on your overall level of discomfort.
    Brian Ellis
    Before you criticize someone, walk a mile in their shoes. That way when you do criticize them you'll be
    a mile away and you'll have their shoes.

  3. #3
    alec4444's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    New York City
    Posts
    655

    Re: Screwed: Re-thinking the 355 G-Claron

    Quote Originally Posted by Brian Ellis
    ...Carrying a heavy lens along with an 11x14 camera and acessories is analogous to lighting a match in Hell in terms of its effect on your overall level of discomfort.
    Thanks, Brian, that's one of the funniest analogies I've heard in a long time....I'm dying over here!!!

  4. #4

    Re: Screwed: Re-thinking the 355 G-Claron

    alec4444,

    " may not have a compendium shade to start."

    It other name is 'dark slide'

    Another option 'JML' process lenses are usually killer sharp and affordable.

    Good luck with it.

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    San Joaquin Valley, California
    Posts
    9,605

    Re: Screwed: Re-thinking the 355 G-Claron

    Don't forget the 14" Dagor, 16-1/2"-19" Artars and 450 Nikkor M. All are wonderful lenses btw.

    I have a 14" Commercial Ektar and its briliant on an 8x10 but I suspect it might not give you much "sharp" wiggle room on an 11x14, at least at the edges. The only way to know for sure is to try one. Jim at Midwest usually keeps one or two in stock at a fair price (thats where I bought mine)

    If you want a barrel lens, I've got a few sitting around that want to go to work.
    "I would feel more optimistic about a bright future for man if he spent less time proving that he can outwit Nature and more time tasting her sweetness and respecting her seniority"---EB White

  6. #6

    Re: Screwed: Re-thinking the 355 G-Claron

    Quote Originally Posted by alec4444
    Well, as another 355mm G-Claron flies by on the bay, I can't help but wonder if one of these is going to be my first 11x14 lens. I bid on it...a fair bid I think, and notta. I had an opportunity to purchase one privately, and it was out of my budget. So now what?

    The 360mm Symmar S appears to be my safe 2nd choice. It's huge. It's heavy. It's multicoated. It's seemingly available and affordable. Other options include:

    --360mm Orbit S II, which is the same as the above (I think) in a generic wrapper.
    --15" APO Raptar force fed into an Ilex shutter
    --Rodenstock's 360mm lens, which seems to be the same price as the Symmar S with less coverage.
    --Nikon 360mm f/6.5 Nikkor-W
    --360mm Schneider Symmar (the convertable one, single coated I think)
    --Kodak 14" Commercial Ektar, though I think it just covers with no movements

    Whaddaya think?

    Uses: B&W, Architecture (need rise!) and landscape, 11x14 camera, contact prints, would prefer a shutter, may not have a compendium shade to start.

    --A
    Reality Check-

    11x14 is not an inexpensive habit. However, I can say with certainty that the 355 G Claron is a truly marvelous lens. Look for one in barrel to get you started and when you can afford it, put it in a Copal #3 and you are set. There are many out there and they come up for sale often so all is not lost.

  7. #7
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Posts
    8,656

    Re: Screwed: Re-thinking the 355 G-Claron

    Quote Originally Posted by alec4444
    The 360mm Symmar S appears to be my safe 2nd choice. It's huge. It's heavy. It's multicoated. It's seemingly available and affordable. Other options include:

    --360mm Orbit S II, which is the same as the above (I think) in a generic wrapper.
    I'd agree with that. I don't know about the Raptar, but among the rest, given that your primary concern is coverage rather than particular subtleties in the rendering, I think the Symmar-S/Caltar S-II/Orbit S-II is likely to give you the best overall performance per dollar spent.

  8. #8
    Sheldon N's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Portland, OR
    Posts
    605

    Re: Screwed: Re-thinking the 355 G-Claron

    There's a 360mm f/9 Graphic Kowa on Ebay this week. It will screw directly into a Copal 3s shutter if you can find one. It's reputed to have coverage for 11x14, though perhaps not much in the way of movements. Auction number 270028616763.

    Otherwise a 360mm Schneider/Nikkor/Fuji plasmat might be the way to go. With a little patience you might find something in the $300-400 price range.

  9. #9
    Sheldon N's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Portland, OR
    Posts
    605

    Re: Screwed: Re-thinking the 355 G-Claron

    Oh, and another option is a just listed Ilex Calumet Caltar 14 3/4" 375mm f/6.3 lens in Ilex 5 shutter. Coverage is spec'd at a 468mm, which would possibly meet your needs. It'll be less expensive, too. Auction #190032491557.

  10. #10

    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Scottsdale, Arizona
    Posts
    235

    Re: Screwed: Re-thinking the 355 G-Claron

    Why not try a 16 1/2 artar - non-red dot (uncoated?)...I picked one up in a shutter for less than $225 bucks. Fantastic lens. Contrast in wonderful. Even though it is not a red dot. Here is an APO Artar Red Dot 161/2 "/9 #836945, in front of Alpax #4 shutter, Ex++ $395 at Igor Camera as an example....

    You could also try a 19" artar - perhaps in a barrel to start.

Similar Threads

  1. barrel G Claron 150
    By Luca Merlo in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 16-Feb-2006, 18:21
  2. Thinking about locations---what fun!
    By John Kasaian in forum On Photography
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 28-Dec-2005, 16:06
  3. 355 G Claron Shutter Swap
    By Kevin Crisp in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 29-Jun-2004, 19:39
  4. G Claron 210/240 Copal 1 swap
    By Stephen Vaughan in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 19-Jan-2004, 09:30
  5. G Claron vs Repro Claron
    By Ron_673 in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 24-Feb-2000, 09:55

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •