Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 21

Thread: Exposure compensation with bellows question.

  1. #11

    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Long Island, NY
    Posts
    310

    Re: Exposure compensation with bellows question.

    +1 for Mark's method.

    Or skip to 4:40 to hear the math explained and reference to the disc


    And there are several smart phone apps that will do this for you. Reciprocity Timer is one such app.

    Or explained another way:
    Convert the focal length of the lens you’re using to inches. For instance, a
    210mm lens is 8”.
    8” (210mm) lens, focused at infinity. Bellows extension 8”
    · Think of inches in terms of f‑stops: f8.
    · Measure the distance from the film plane to the lens board.
    · Let’s say the distance is 11”. Think of f‑stops: f11.
    Bellows extension 11”, measured from middle of shutter to ground glass.
    · The difference between the focal length, 8”, and the focusing distance, 11”,
    can be thought of as one stop difference. F8 to f11.

    Excerpted from Finely Focused

  2. #12

    Re: Exposure compensation with bellows question.

    TTL 4x5 5x7 8x10 Broncolor Strobe Meters Norma Sinarsix Cassettes by Nokton48, on Flickr

    I use the Sinarsix for TTL spot metering at the film plane. I find this to be the most accurate and quick method for my uses. I find the Olde Norma Lunasix Meter Probe to be deadly accurate for available light spot metering. The FCM2 measures TTL strobe and ambient, and is new to me. Love it. I may just stop bracketing after I get more confident with it.
    Last edited by Daniel Unkefer; 3-Apr-2024 at 05:54.
    Flikr Photos Here: https://www.flickr.com/photos/18134483@N04/

    “The secret of getting ahead is getting started.”
    ― Mark Twain

  3. #13
    Eric Woodbury
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    1,649

    Re: Exposure compensation with bellows question.

    My rule of thumb.

    Example: If I'm using an 8 inch lens (210mm) and it is focused at 11 inches, then that is the equivalent of one stop addition (in this not-so-cleaver example, notice that 8 inches would be like f/8 and 11 inches would be like f/11) Therefore, I change in opposite direction to compensate the f/# by one stop (from f/11 to f/8 or f/22 to f/16). No ruler needed if you can guess kinda close. Or mark a ruler on your camera to calibrate your guesses. When in doubt, give a little extra.

    75mm = 3 inches, 100 mm = 4 inches, 150 = 6 inches 210=8 inches, 300 mm = 12 inches, etc.

    Metric folks could use centimeters and it would work fine without a too many zeros involved.

  4. #14

    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Hamilton, Canada
    Posts
    1,885

    Re: Exposure compensation with bellows question.

    The “H” is designed to be a hand-holdable architectural camera for travel. How close does it focus?

  5. #15

    Re: Exposure compensation with bellows question.

    How about this? My exposures TTL generally run within 1/3 stop of indicated.

    Sinar Norma Handy w TTL Sinarsix metering by Nokton48, on Flickr
    Flikr Photos Here: https://www.flickr.com/photos/18134483@N04/

    “The secret of getting ahead is getting started.”
    ― Mark Twain

  6. #16

    Join Date
    Sep 1998
    Location
    Oregon now (formerly Austria)
    Posts
    3,412

    Re: Exposure compensation with bellows question.

    Quote Originally Posted by Mark Sawyer View Post
    If measuring the aperture is difficult in your usual situation, just make a chart of the aperture sizes at the standard f/stops. Say you have a 210mm lens; at f/5.6, divide 210mm by 5.6, your actual aperture size is 37.5mm. At f/8, 210mm divided by 8 is 26.25mm, etc. Now just measure your bellows extension and divide by your aperture size and you'll have your actual, real, working f/stop value.

    Or you can divide the square of this by the square of that and get another number to multiply your exposure by...
    Well, I've made the chart and have it with me, but it's just the exposure compensation. That said, all I have to do is measure and apply the appropriate compensation; zero calculating anything. If I were doing lots of macro work (like you do), having a real, working f-stop value would likely be valuable. Still, I get around the whole depth-of-field calculation thing by using a focus-spread method of finding the optimum f-stop, which works regardless of bellows extension.

    More than one way to peel the onion

    Doremus

  7. #17

    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    268

    Re: Exposure compensation with bellows question.

    Quote Originally Posted by Dan Fromm View Post
    Hmm. I use a slightly roundabout way to do it.

    Step 1. Focus the lens at the desired magnification, i.e., set the shot up.

    Step 2. Measure extension. This the distance the lens has been moved forward from the infinity position. I measure how far the front standard has moved cos the cameras I do this with have fixed rear standards.

    Step 3. Calculate effective f/number as f/number set * (extension / focal length). When extension/focal length = 2 (image on sensitized surface the same size as the subject), f/8 set becomes f/16 effective. And so on.

    I do this in the field, carry a small tape measure with me.
    This can't be right. Assume you are taking a picture of an object "near infinity", i.e. far enough that one should not even worry about correction. Extension as you define it
    Measure extension. This the distance the lens has been moved forward from the infinity position.
    is close to zero; more precisely extension<<F.L.
    Then the f-number following your recipe becomes "very small", like, e.g. f/8 becomes f/0.5, when it should remain f/8 or very close.
    Your formula at step 3
    Calculate effective f/number as f/number set * (extension / focal length)
    should be:
    Calculate effective f/number as f/number set * [(extension / focal length)+1]

    Plus, there is an implicit assumption about the location of the exit pupil, but let's keep it simple.

  8. #18

    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    8,488

    Re: Exposure compensation with bellows question.

    Quote Originally Posted by Bernard_L View Post
    This can't be right. Assume you are taking a picture of an object "near infinity", i.e. far enough that one should not even worry about correction. Extension as you define it

    is close to zero; more precisely extension<<F.L.
    Huh? When the lens is focused at infinity the distance from the lens' rear node to the film plane is the focal length. Exactly. Where the standard then sits is the infinity position. It depends on the lens' design type -- broadly, retrofocus, telephoto, neither -- and mechanical design and need not be 1 f from the film plane.

    I did make a mistake, effective f/# is f/# set * 1 + (extension/focal length)

  9. #19

    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    268

    Re: Exposure compensation with bellows question.

    Quote Originally Posted by Dan Fromm View Post
    Huh? When the lens is focused at infinity the distance from the lens' rear node to the film plane is the focal length. Exactly. Where the standard then sits is the infinity position.
    Yes. and
    Step 2. Measure extension. This the distance the lens has been moved forward from the infinity position.
    the extension as you defined it is zero when focused at infinity. And the standard, rear flange, etc sit where they need sit.

  10. #20

    Join Date
    May 2023
    Posts
    8

    Re: Exposure compensation with bellows question.

    Quote Originally Posted by cowanw View Post
    Is the bellows on the front or the back of the Silvestri H camera. How close can you focus?
    Hello, sorry for the late reply had an accident that needed an emergency room visit and quite a few stitches in my hand.
    The bellows are at the back of the camera. The lens fits onto the front of a body and the bellows if needed is attached on the back of the body. It has a ground glass that a focusing prism can be attached, once focused the prism is removed and the film back is then attached. Just got a Schneider 100mm f5.6 Copal 0, lens cost $530, the Silvestri bayonet mount cost me $450 a crazy amount for what it is. Have not yet fully tested it but it gets close enough for me if doing table top or a flower. Beautifully made equipment from Florence Italy, but very expensive.

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 10
    Last Post: 27-Nov-2022, 16:15
  2. Help -- Exposure Compensation for Bellows
    By mediopollito in forum Cameras & Camera Accessories
    Replies: 34
    Last Post: 31-Dec-2015, 21:27
  3. Exposure Compensation for 210mm
    By Ken Grooms in forum Style & Technique
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 8-Nov-2006, 18:09
  4. Bellows ext. exposure compensation for telephoto
    By Charles Forde in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 11-Aug-2005, 00:24
  5. Extended Bellows exposure compensation
    By Larry Gaskill in forum Style & Technique
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 3-Feb-2001, 11:02

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •