Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 13 of 13

Thread: The F.64 BPX Back Pack does not seem to have a place for a tripod. What do people do?

  1. #11

    Join Date
    Dec 1999
    Location
    Forest Grove, Ore.
    Posts
    4,680

    Re: The F.64 BPX Back Pack does not seem to have a place for a tripod. What do people

    I've always carried my tripod, while my backpack was strapped on my back.

    In earlier days, my tripod and tripod head weighed upwards of 14 lbs. Now, my CF tripod and head together weighs about half of that. A lot easier. On a rough trail, sometimes the tripod can come in handy to steady one's self.

  2. #12

    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Newbury, Vermont
    Posts
    2,292

    Re: The F.64 BPX Back Pack does not seem to have a place for a tripod. What do people

    If I'm backpacking my otherwise "lightweight" MF/LF gear, I usually strap my lightweight Feisol "Tall Traveller" tripod to my pack and hardly notice its weight...nor its "moving mass" as I strap it securely and well centered.

    But Strapping my larger, heavier, bulkier Gitzo CF tripod to my equipment pack is another matter entirely, so I usually will carry this over a shoulder...unless the terrain demands that I have two free hands (with or without hiking poles) for safety reasons.

    Hmmm...someone should design a "combo tripod/hiking pole system," with two sturdy hiking poles which are basically two CF tripod legs, while the third leg, with tripod head attached, is strapped to the backpack. This would allow for a very sturdy LF tripod, while mitigating "overbalancing" of a backpack, and take care of the issue of "pod redundancy" and excess (useless) weight. Sounds like a plan - ya think?

  3. #13

    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Posts
    316

    Re: The F.64 BPX Back Pack does not seem to have a place for a tripod. What do people

    There are tripods with a leg that's a detachable monopod. One could use that as a hiking pole while strapping the rest of the tripod on one's back. I think that detachable-leg tripods are mostly lighter duty than typically used for LF cameras (let alone 8x10).

    I sometimes hike with skis strapped to my backpack (when the intention is to get to skiable snow). It's not trivial, people have different preferences for ski-carry systems - skis strapped together or A-frame? etc - but skis are at least as awkward as a large tripod, and yet many people manage to backpack them. Part of the problem, IMO, is that most photo backpacks are not very good as backpacks, and so they may be unstable or uncomfortable with a tripod strapped to the side or back. A backpack with a proper backpacking suspension should be able to carry a tripod on the side or back without tipping over the wearer.

Similar Threads

  1. New back pack
    By esearing in forum Kickstarter Announcements
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 16-Aug-2019, 13:31
  2. Ries Tripod- Best Place To Buy
    By Bruce E. Rathbun in forum Gear
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 21-Oct-2001, 06:55
  3. Which back pack??
    By Rob Rielly in forum Gear
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 4-Feb-2000, 17:55

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •