Originally Posted by
jnantz
not sure why it matters whether they care about "artistic merit" or not. a lot of people think something is artistic when it's not, some people claim their work is "fine-art" and when you ask what that means it's like a deer in the headlights , besides when it comes to photography, everyone and his brother no matter how good or not as good they might or might not be, believes they are a "fine art photographer".. I mean people ooo and aahhhh over stuff I have no interest in, and scratch their heads regarding things I think have artistic merit, and I have an education in art and architecture. LOL ...
I think the whole question about who the low hanging fruit is is kind of funny because no one ever thinks their work is lame, derivative, lacking artistic merit &c, because in the end it has as much merit as some Ansel Adams or Edward Weston photograph ... and somethings in life are loving things that is so schlocky, tacky derivative and lacking artistic merit just-because ... I mean have you ever seen the movies the brain that wouldn't die, frankenhooker or the baby ? high art and great film.
Bookmarks