Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 19

Thread: Agitation and highlight density

  1. #1

    Agitation and highlight density

    Hello,
    After various trials and errors regarding Ilford ID11 stock solution to water ratios I settled on 1:4 and 28-30 minutes at 20-23ish degrees C. My question concerns agitation times. Is it true that the whites develop first, then the greys and ending with the blacks? I have gone down to agitating six seconds with one and a half minute breaks for the first five minutes then agitating 10 seconds every 1.5 minutes for the remaining 23-25 minutes. My greys are awesome in tonal range but i still seem to be blowing out the whites. The detail is there, in the whites when i reduce contrast in Photoshop but i'd rather get it right before making prints with the enlarger. I use a 4x5 Graflex speed graphic with an aposironar and Ilford FP4 film and flash at about 1.5 m from the subject.
    Thanks
    Mark

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    833

    Re: Blowing and agitating whites

    Do you want a nice negative quite easily? Use HP5+ rated at 100 and develop in Ilfotech HC or Kodak HC110 1:31 68* 5:00. Beautiful skin tones.

  3. #3
    Vaughn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Humboldt County, CA
    Posts
    9,223

    Re: Blowing and agitating whites

    Quote Originally Posted by Mark Kononczuk View Post
    ...Is it true that the whites develop first, then the greys and ending with the blacks? ...
    Thanks
    Mark
    No. All tones start developing at the same time. Since less silver was exposed in the shadows, they finish first. Reduce your development (time/temp/dilution/aggitation) to prevent blowing out highlights..
    "Landscapes exist in the material world yet soar in the realms of the spirit..." Tsung Ping, 5th Century China

  4. #4

    Join Date
    May 2015
    Location
    SooooCal/LA USA
    Posts
    2,803

    Re: Blowing and agitating whites

    Quik review of basic film development;

    The EI of the film is the threshold in the shadow of the clear areas where it starts to record shadow detail (above the fog level)... This level develops early in the process and doesn't change much at all through the process (but you need adequate exposure to reach that shadow threshold)...

    The midtones develop with a changing key and curve, but excess development can cause grain to really pop out if excessively developed...

    The dense highlight areas on the neg is the area of most chemical activity and energy, building up to dense Dmax where light is not transmitted through causing bleached highlights where the grain has clumped up and hard to print or scan... Developing too much will cause these areas to block up...

    So the old photographer's rule:

    Expose for the shadows, develop for the highlights...

    Over developing is probably the issue, so backing down the developing time is first... You can develop a fogged over sheet and hold it up to a light, and try to see your finger behind it (slightly)... That's about the proper level of developing time when visible, and easy to print highlights through...

    Good luck testing!!!

    Steve K

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Location
    North Dakota
    Posts
    1,329

    Re: Blowing and agitating whites

    If you "settled" on a particular dilution/time/temperature and it is not giving you what you need - change something.
    Better temperature control might help.
    This might help: Beyond Basic Photography: A Technical Manual by Henry Horenstein. A good book on darkroom process.
    ” Never attribute to inspiration that which can be adequately explained by delusion”.

  6. #6
    multiplex
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    local
    Posts
    5,380

    Re: Blowing and agitating whites

    use sprint film developer, it is nearly impossible to blow out highlights even if the film is over exposed a little bit. you might also consider doing a few test exposures using your dark slide to make a test strip of your film, and bracket your development to decide what developer and film exposure combination works with your personal exposure, development, printing style

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Location
    Montreal, Canada
    Posts
    2,025

    Re: Blowing and agitating whites

    If I’m understanding what you’re saying, your would like your negatives to be less contrasty. Shorten the development time. Pretty much as simple as that.

    Quote Originally Posted by Mark Kononczuk View Post
    Hello,
    After various trials and errors regarding Ilford ID11 stock solution to water ratios I settled on 1:4 and 28-30 minutes at 20-23ish degrees C. My question concerns agitation times. Is it true that the whites develop first, then the greys and ending with the blacks? I have gone down to agitating six seconds with one and a half minute breaks for the first five minutes then agitating 10 seconds every 1.5 minutes for the remaining 23-25 minutes. My greys are awesome in tonal range but i still seem to be blowing out the whites. The detail is there, in the whites when i reduce contrast in Photoshop but i'd rather get it right before making prints with the enlarger. I use a 4x5 Graflex speed graphic with an aposironar and Ilford FP4 film and flash at about 1.5 m from the subject.
    Thanks
    Mark

  8. #8
    Tin Can's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    22,510

    Re: Blowing and agitating whites

    Now that should be widely repeated

    Concise

    Thank you

    Quote Originally Posted by Vaughn View Post
    No. All tones start developing at the same time. Since less silver was exposed in the shadows, they finish first. Reduce your development (time/temp/dilution/aggitation) to prevent blowing out highlights..
    Tin Can

  9. #9
    Resident Heretic Bruce Watson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    USA, North Carolina
    Posts
    3,362

    Re: Blowing and agitating whites

    Quote Originally Posted by Vaughn View Post
    No. All tones start developing at the same time. Since less silver was exposed in the shadows, they finish first. Reduce your development (time/temp/dilution/aggitation) to prevent blowing out highlights..
    Exactly this.

    Or as people have been saying for about as long photography has existed, "expose for the shadows, develop for the highlights".

    Bruce Watson

  10. #10
    Mark Sawyer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Stuck inside of Tucson with the Neverland Blues again...
    Posts
    6,269

    Re: Blowing and agitating whites

    If you're often photographing in situations where the highlights blow out, look into stand developing, also referred to as compensating developing.
    "I love my Verito lens, but I always have to sharpen everything in Photoshop..."

Similar Threads

  1. Highlight Midtone Shadow and all in between
    By bob carnie in forum Digital Processing
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 30-Sep-2015, 09:13
  2. Pt/Pd Highlight Development
    By joekenney in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 21-Sep-2010, 04:17
  3. Help! Highlight ghosts?
    By Ola in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 31-Aug-2008, 08:15
  4. Film for highlight masking
    By Matthew Cordery in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 27-Jun-2007, 22:37
  5. Developer for better highlight seperation w/ HP5
    By brian steinberger in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 10-Jun-2006, 19:19

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •