Page 1 of 11 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 104

Thread: Is fiber paper worth the additional cost for selling prints compared to rc paper?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Question Is fiber paper worth the additional cost for selling prints compared to rc paper?

    I have a question for you if you sell your prints or purchase prints that artists have up for sale.

    Do you feel like the visual difference between fiber paper and resin-coated paper is enough to justify the additional cost of fiber paper? Fiber paper costs more, and you have to invest more time to ensure you develop and wash it properly.

    I have two prints of the same scene sitting in front of me. I made one on Ilford fiber glossy paper and the other on Ilford MG glossy RC paper. I am thinking long and hard. I can't tell if I'm imagining any differences I see between the RC paper and the fiber paper. I like the fiber a little more.

    RC paper's wash process makes my printing routine in this cramped space less of a chore. It's also cheaper, and I don't need a press machine to flatten it. I like the feel of the fiber paper in my hand a lot more, but I plan to frame my prints.

    What do you all think?

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    San Joaquin Valley, California
    Posts
    9,603

    Re: Is fiber paper worth the additional cost for selling prints compared to rc paper?

    If I hang up a picture, it's because I can connect with what the picture is of. All the rest is just details.
    I print on fiber paper because I enjoy printing on fiber paper. If I wanted to save time, I'd print digitally.
    My 2-cents anyway (how come 'puters don't have the cent sign?)
    "I would feel more optimistic about a bright future for man if he spent less time proving that he can outwit Nature and more time tasting her sweetness and respecting her seniority"---EB White

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Rondo, Missouri
    Posts
    2,126

    Re: Is fiber paper worth the additional cost for selling prints compared to rc paper?

    Quote Originally Posted by John Kasaian View Post
    (how come 'puters don't have the cent sign?)
    Hold down the Alt key and type 0162.¢
    Michael W. Graves
    Michael's Pub

    If it ain't broke....don't fix it!

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    Sheridan, Colorado
    Posts
    2,456

    Re: Is fiber paper worth the additional cost for selling prints compared to rc paper?

    -- AFTER you first press the NUM LOCK key.

  5. #5
    Nicholas O. Lindan
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Cleveland, Ohio
    Posts
    465

    Re: Is fiber paper worth the additional cost for selling prints compared to rc paper?

    I used to sell prints via galleries and hangings. It was all fiber. Yes, it is a bit of a pain but I figure if someone is shelling out good money for the product the product should be as high quality as I can make it, without going overboard.

    The issue is defining 'overboard.'

    In my book if an RC print sells for little money as a result of no frame, regular ole' mat board & spray adhesive mounting then it isn't overboard or underboard - it's made to a price.

    I think the answer hinges on whether the premium price for fiber is something a customer will pay for.

    I have some 30 YO framed RC prints hanging on my walls and all of them have bronzed to various extents. I live in the 'burbs and air quality is good - much better than when Cleveland still had steel mills. I don't know if current Ilford RC papers have the same problem. Loose RC prints from the same time that are stored in flat files look fine.

    This is an issue that has been well debated, with no definitive outcome to the debate. I guess the answer is 'it is up to you.'
    Darkroom Automation / Cleveland Engineering Design, LLC
    f-Stop Timers & Enlarging meters http://www.darkroomautomation.com/da-main.htm

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Dec 1999
    Location
    Forest Grove, Ore.
    Posts
    4,680

    Re: Is fiber paper worth the additional cost for selling prints compared to rc paper?

    I tried some RC paper when I was in my 20's. Instinctively, I wanted nothing more to do with that "paper". Since then, RC "paper" has never again made its way into my darkroom.

    Quote Originally Posted by nolindan View Post
    . . . I have some 30 YO framed RC prints hanging on my walls and all of them have bronzed to various extents. I live in the 'burbs and air quality is good - much better than when Cleveland still had steel mills. I don't know if current Ilford RC papers have the same problem. Loose RC prints from the same time that are stored in flat files look fine.
    I have framed, dry-mounted, fiber-based photographs that were printed decades ago, and they all look like they did (to my eye) the day they were mounted. None of them have shown any deterioration.

    The above says it all for me. It appears that my instincts were right on target.

  7. #7
    Tin Can's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    22,505

    Re: Is fiber paper worth the additional cost for selling prints compared to rc paper?

    I like both as I practice with RC

    Every print is NOT Fine ART
    Tin Can

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    3,901

    Re: Is fiber paper worth the additional cost for selling prints compared to rc paper?

    Over the decades of making B&W prints have developed an absolute dis-like for RC paper. They look like artificial RC plastic pix.

    Fiber base B&W paper usually comes in gloss or matt, of these two the gloss is preferred and has been that way to this day.


    Bernice

  9. #9

    Join Date
    Aug 2000
    Location
    California
    Posts
    3,908

    Re: Is fiber paper worth the additional cost for selling prints compared to rc paper?

    Quote Originally Posted by Bernice Loui View Post
    Over the decades of making B&W prints have developed an absolute dis-like for RC paper. They look like artificial RC plastic pix.

    Fiber base B&W paper usually comes in gloss or matt, of these two the gloss is preferred and has been that way to this day.


    Bernice
    I totally agree with you. I see no value in the use of RC regardless of price. Some say they use it to see if an image is worth printing on fiber paper, toning, etc.
    The 2 prints will be too different to help with this decision.

  10. #10
    Tin Can's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    22,505

    Re: Is fiber paper worth the additional cost for selling prints compared to rc paper?

    24 years ago my instructor insisted on hot mount Fiber Prints, I made a lot

    They do look like new

    but I never sell any ART

    RC is very fast to check many other variables
    Tin Can

Similar Threads

  1. Tripods: Is Carbon Fiber worth the extra cost?
    By r_a_feldman in forum Gear
    Replies: 27
    Last Post: 15-Feb-2021, 12:41
  2. Grade 2 graded paper worth the extra cost?
    By Neal Chaves in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 18-Sep-2010, 05:37
  3. Favorite Fiber Based paper for big prints (30X40 and up)
    By Natha Congdon in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 17-Apr-2001, 14:03
  4. Is ferrotyping worth doing on modern glossy fiber paper?
    By octagon in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 1-Nov-2000, 21:25

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •