Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Sacrifice Rear Movements for Stability

  1. #1

    Sacrifice Rear Movements for Stability

    Ive been able to handle a few 11x14s of friends and colleagues and have noticed that the sheer mass of ULF cameras make for some wonky rear standards.

    Im curious if a camera maker like Richard Ritter could strip the movements off an existing camera to make the rear more solid or if the nature of these cameras and their mass make for a perception of instability. Those who own those cameras all told me they fear soft negatives because of this perception of instability but in practice the cameras work. Its an interesting note.

    Could you work with a more limited tool?


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  2. #2
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Posts
    7,601

    Re: Sacrifice Rear Movements for Stability

    Have you seen Alan Brubaker's wind stabilizer accessory?

    http://www.filmholders.com/wskit.html

    Quote Originally Posted by dodphotography View Post
    Could you work with a more limited tool?
    Yes, happily. I can't remember the last time I used any movement other than front rise/fall.

  3. #3
    Vaughn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Humboldt County, CA
    Posts
    7,868

    Re: Sacrifice Rear Movements for Stability

    I have been working with a 5x7 camera with front movements limited to rise/fall and has back rise/fall, swing and tilt movements. The limited front movements stabalizes the lens end of things, which is far more sensitive to movement than the back. 110 yr old Eastman View No.2.

    I have worked with an equally old Kodak 11x14 and a brand new one from Chamonix. The old beast was a little wobbly -- but largely due to age and condition. I replaced it because it needs to be rebuilt after a century of work. But no matter how wobbly a camera is, once one has it set up and darkslide removed, chances are it will be fine once it settles down (no wind). I got some mightly sharp negs out of the old beast.
    "Landscapes exist in the material world yet soar in the realms of the spirit..." Tsung Ping, 5th Century China

  4. #4
    lab black
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    114

    Re: Sacrifice Rear Movements for Stability

    +1 regarding Alan's wind stabilizer.
    "We work in the dark, we do what we can, we give what we have."
    Henry James

  5. #5
    Drew Wiley
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    SF Bay area, CA
    Posts
    14,509

    Re: Sacrifice Rear Movements for Stability

    Dick Phillips made a few 11X14's analogous to his original 8x10, which have only rear base tilt via a pair of hinges connecting the back to the bed, which allows folding up the camera too, of course. I use one of those earlier 8x10's, serial no. 009, and love that particular simplified construction for its stability, reliability, fast set-up, and reduced weight.
    Last edited by Drew Wiley; 18-Aug-2020 at 18:28.

  6. #6
    Vaughn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Humboldt County, CA
    Posts
    7,868

    Re: Sacrifice Rear Movements for Stability

    Nice compromise.
    "Landscapes exist in the material world yet soar in the realms of the spirit..." Tsung Ping, 5th Century China

Similar Threads

  1. Deardorff Rear standard stability question // help
    By Serge S in forum LF DIY (Do It Yourself)
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 2-Nov-2018, 15:44
  2. Movements and camera stability
    By koh303 in forum Cameras & Camera Accessories
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 8-May-2016, 03:30
  3. Do you use the rear movements on your Technika?
    By Bill_1856 in forum Style & Technique
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 20-May-2012, 07:28
  4. Wista VX: rear movements
    By s. gregory in forum Cameras & Camera Accessories
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 17-May-2001, 09:38

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •