In fact all long focals rise a lot the image circle when doing a front tilt,
a tele rises it less than a regular lens !!!!
_____
Hi Pere, thanks for that detailed reply. You have a good point about the 500 vs 720. I will have to try both focal lengths in the field and see over time if I can in fact just use the 500 and crop.
Thanks!
I wanted to know, and... with the 720mm T nikon, a 10º tilt provocates a circle rise that is 42mm smaller that the one that would provocate a regular non Tele lens,
So a Tele lens is more suitable than a regular lens for field cameras that have limitations in the movements, not only for the commanded extension, but also (usually) it would be benefical that you have a lower rise provocated by a front tilt.
It was a urban legend, the reality is that having the nodal point in front of the (long focal) lens is benefical because it decreases the rise effect of a front tilt, compared to a regular lens having the nodal near aperture.
______________
With long focals, use first the rear tilt, after reaching rear tilt limit you have to use the front tilt, but with a Tele lens you will be able to tilt more degrees, as a regular lens exhausts sooner the rise margin you have for compensating.
______________
Note that while the T system has clear advantages for the field... also a Tele lens has optical drawbacks. It is true that in many situations you'll have other limiting factors. But in particular it's not clear to me if the 720 is necessary, as we may get mostly the same quality if shooting with the 500 and later taking the crop of the equivalent framing, specially if we use a sharp film like (say) TMX or Velvia.
Bookmarks