Page 5 of 7 FirstFirst ... 34567 LastLast
Results 41 to 50 of 65

Thread: Light Tripods: The Weak Link?

  1. #41

    Join Date
    Sep 1998
    Location
    Loganville , GA
    Posts
    14,410

    Re: Light Tripods: The Weak Link?

    Quote Originally Posted by mdarnton View Post
    All wood is not the same and it's a serious mistake to believe that they are. You will not find any ash violins, guitars, violas, pianos, etc., and there's a reason for that. You will, however find, I believe, that wood tripods are almost exclusively made of woods that no violin maker in his right mind would touch with a ten-foot pole.
    And all metals are not the same as are all shapes that aluminum tripod legs may take!

    Take a good close look at the leg of a Linhof Light Weight Pro tripod.
    First, the leg material is duralumin, an aircraft grade aluminum.
    Then the front face of the leg is arced, it is not flat and it is not circular shaped, it then bends on each edge for added strength and rigidity. Any vibration, if any, is dampened out much faster then legs of any material, in any shape of similar or heavier weight.

  2. #42
    Tin Can's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    22,511

    Re: Light Tripods: The Weak Link?

    Most of us have a good number of tripods.

    No point in selling any as shipping is now too high.

    My first real tripod was a Benbo No1 made in England. Really goofy to use, but can be configured almost infinitely.

    Probably bought it as they use 'whist' in the instructions.
    Tin Can

  3. #43

    Join Date
    Sep 1998
    Location
    Loganville , GA
    Posts
    14,410

    Re: Light Tripods: The Weak Link?

    Quote Originally Posted by mdarnton View Post
    All wood is not the same and it's a serious mistake to believe that they are. You will not find any ash violins, guitars, violas, pianos, etc., and there's a reason for that. You will, however find, I believe, that wood tripods are almost exclusively made of woods that no violin maker in his right mind would touch with a ten-foot pole.
    You had best google for tonewoods. You will find that ash is a hardwood used for electric guitars. Ries states on their web site that most of their tripods are made from tonewoods.

    Berlebach uses ash.

  4. #44
    Peter De Smidt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    Fond du Lac, WI, USA
    Posts
    8,976

    Re: Light Tripods: The Weak Link?

    Is not hard maple used in string instruments? Ok, so it’s not the sound board, but wood does vibrate.
    “You often feel tired, not because you've done too much, but because you've done too little of what sparks a light in you.”
    ― Alexander Den Heijer, Nothing You Don't Already Know

  5. #45

    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Posts
    4,566

    Re: Light Tripods: The Weak Link?

    Any material vibrates... Another thing is how the vibration is damped in a material.

    Damping usually would be better in a wood tripod than in a metallic one.

  6. #46

    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    1,856

    Re: Light Tripods: The Weak Link?

    I just want to comment that all I said was that I did a direct comparison between two similar sized and weighted tripods, with the same head and plate, one metal and one wood. I would welcome others to do similar comparisons. Then we would have real data rather than a bunch of opinions based on what people think should happen.
    Last edited by mdarnton; 21-Apr-2019 at 16:22.
    Thanks, but I'd rather just watch:
    Large format: http://flickr.com/michaeldarnton
    Mostly 35mm: http://flickr.com/mdarnton
    You want digital, color, etc?: http://www.flickr.com/photos/stradofear

  7. #47

    Join Date
    Sep 1998
    Location
    Loganville , GA
    Posts
    14,410

    Re: Light Tripods: The Weak Link?

    Quote Originally Posted by mdarnton View Post
    I just want to comment that all I said was that I did a direct comparison between two similar sized and weighted tripods, with the same head and plate,one metal and one wood. I would welcome others to do similar comparisons. Then we would have real data rather than a bunch of opinions based on what people think should happen.
    Since I marketed Linhof, Berlebach, Novoflex, Giottos Bilora, and Rollei tripods whose legs were made of duralumin, aluminum, ash, carbon fiber, basalt. I have had some experience comparing these. In my studio I had also used the largest Davis Sanford, Majestic, Star D, Tiltall, and some others whose names I can’t remember after all these years.

    I sold tripods to major telescope manufacturers, including Questar and TeleVue.

    I have seen tests of tripod vibrations ranging from Questar placing an 8” scope on various tripods on a concrete pad and having a 300lb + employee jump up and down on the pad and timing how long vibration remained in the scope. To raising tripods to the same height, with or without the column, placing a half full shot glass (water) and tapping a leg lightly and seeing how long the water moved in the glass. To Leica Magazine taping graph paper to a wall and a laser pointer on the tripod legs, pointing to the center of the graph paper, and photographing the movement of the laser beam after a small weight, tied to a string, was released to tap the leg with the pointer. To Berlebach printing the results of vibration testing by TUV on the back page of their brochure (it may be posted on their web site).

    I have seen Berlebach win, Giottos win, Linhof win, that means, that depending how you test a wood, a round tube aluminum or carbon or basalt, a profile shaped aluminum can all win.

    So, unless I was following action like sports or wildlife, I wait a few seconds for vibrations to settle out, even when hanging a weight beneath the tripod, before taking the picture.

    If you use any tripod properly you will always get the best results, this also means that you should leave a loop in a cable release to eliminate vibration that you can transmit to the lens by having a pulled taut cable release.

  8. #48

    Join Date
    Sep 1998
    Location
    Loganville , GA
    Posts
    14,410

    Re: Light Tripods: The Weak Link?

    Quote Originally Posted by Kiwi7475 View Post
    Wow those prices are ridiculous! (Or maybe I’m a cheapo ;-)
    Those two tripods could substitute as lowly columns! They have tremendous weight capacity!

    Art museums used to use very heavy IR TV cameras to inspect old paintings to see what, if anything, was under the visible image. I sold many of these museums the Heavy Duty Pro tripod, the metal version Randy linked to, with a Linhof dolly, the Linhof Large Geared Column and a custom 18” long Linhof focusing stage to allow the camera to be moved left to right over the 18” length.

    The reason this system was chosen was that when moving the camera up and down via the column the camera could not move left to right and when using the stage to move the camera left to right there could be no up and down motion. And, of course, no vibration while handling these very heavy cameras, especially as the column was cranked up or down or the camera moved left to right on the focusing stage.

    There are other uses for what is taken as photographic purposes then what most assume, one other use for some of the Linhof tripods and larger geared and goniometric heads was fo4 positioning large things accurately, like radar antennas. Some of these items had to be able to withstand being buried in sand for months!

  9. #49
    Tin Can's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    22,511

    Re: Light Tripods: The Weak Link?

    I will add, that when I was in a wheelchair amd sleeping on a folding Zero Gravity chair, I used my Linhof Heavy Duty Tripod with the very heavy 8X10 Color Kardon it came with as a way to transfer from one to the other.

    Using a huge camera for counter balance motivated me to change chairs.

    It did not move and gave me hope for another day.

    I no longer need either chair and very glad of it!
    Tin Can

  10. #50

    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Collinsville, CT USA
    Posts
    2,332

    Re: Light Tripods: The Weak Link?

    Also have owned both, wood and not wood. Even though the wood one was a bit heavier, subjectively, much preferred carrying it over my shoulder. Think I once read that Questar recommended the not wood model, but maybe the wood model just wasn't considered by them. Used metal ones can be had for under $300 if you're patient and willing to wait till one comes along. Shipping costs can be exorbitant... On one of the ones I acquired, the seller added in $100 for shipping and handling! But because his "buy-it-now" price was under $200, in the end it was still a great a bargain. Bob's? quote of louping the shutter release cord to prevent vibration was one of the first things that I learned at RIT when taking their LF class.

Similar Threads

  1. O. Winston link Tripods
    By Jeff Morfit in forum Gear
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 27-Jun-2011, 18:06
  2. Replies: 2
    Last Post: 7-Jul-2009, 10:48
  3. Monitor--The weak link in color management
    By carl geyer in forum Digital Hardware
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 4-Mar-2009, 07:57
  4. Feisol CT-3372 and CT-3472 Ultra Light Heavy Duty Tripods
    By Really Big Cameras in forum Announcements
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 9-May-2008, 23:28
  5. Super long expsures (we're talkin' 6 hours here) and light tripods.
    By PhotographicBlack in forum Style & Technique
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 3-Sep-2006, 16:54

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •