March Portraits

[SoulfulRecover]

I am pretty sure the top issue is due to running out of usable image circle. Too much tilt and fall/fall.

On the photo of the negative you quoted me on, yes that’s from heavy tilt. However on the prior photos posted, there are some dark swirls that look chemical on the top left corners. I checked the negatives and the marks are NOT on the negatives themselves. Turns out they are newton rings from the negative being photographed in the plastic sleeves on the light table.

[hsandler]

Ruth. Graflex Crown Graphic 4x5. Rodenstock Sironar 240mm f5.6 at f11. Delta 100 at box speed. XTOL 1:2 13min at 20C. One flash in large umbrella; fill flash bounced off ceiling.

Ruth by Howard Sandler, on Flickr

[BBW]

Great job on the lighting and I love the details in the portrait! Well done Howard.

[blue4130]

So I hope this counts as large format... The total film area is 4x5, just not in one piece.
Self Portrait
Chamonix 4x5, Rodenstock sironar 210mm, lucky100 x 3 jammed into a 4x5 holder.
MG_8719 by Vance, on Flickr

[z84]

Linhof Technika, Rodenstock 150mm, Tri-x

[Tin Can]

Interesting!

[chassis]

Ruth. Graflex Crown Graphic 4x5. Rodenstock Sironar 240mm f5.6 at f11. Delta 100 at box speed. XTOL 1:2 13min at 20C. One flash in large umbrella; fill flash bounced off ceiling.

Ruth by Howard Sandler, on Flickr

Well done Howard. Great lighting and pose.

[chassis]

So I hope this counts as large format... The total film area is 4x5, just not in one piece.
Self Portrait
Chamonix 4x5, Rodenstock sironar 210mm, lucky100 x 3 jammed into a 4x5 holder.
MG_8719 by Vance, on Flickr

Very clever and interesting, Vance.

[chassis]

Linhof Technika, Rodenstock 150mm, Tri-x

Well done, lighting and pose are good.

[Tin Can]

Looked up z84 website, I like the 2 'home' movies.

Better done than most from the 1950's. Editing is good.