Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 12

Thread: Tray development and Pyrocat

  1. #1

    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Chicagoland
    Posts
    494

    Tray development and Pyrocat

    When developing 5x7 film I use tubes and Pyrocat HD 2:2:100.

    For Whole Plate film I have to use tray development. I've been using the same ratios of A and B and water. I would like to know what ratios others are using for tray development and Pyrocat. I always thought it was designed for rotary processing and I'm just trying to check my methods to see if they are sound. Also how much extra time is added for tray processing vs. rotary?

    thanks,
    chris

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    North of Chicago
    Posts
    1,758

    Re: Tray development and Pyrocat

    I use Pyrocat HD 1:1:100 in a slosher, does that count? It works great. I'd start by adding about 15% to your rotary times, but you'll need to play with that, depends on your technique and how you agitate.
    ____________________________________________

    Richard Wasserman

    https://www.rwasserman.com/

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Massachusetts USA
    Posts
    8,476

    Re: Tray development and Pyrocat

    You might find this web site helpful: http://www.pyrocat-hd.com

  4. #4
    Jason Windingstad
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Tucson, AZ
    Posts
    82

    Re: Tray development and Pyrocat

    Chris, I develop with 2:2:100 Pyrocat HD in both trays and BTZS tubes. When I tray develop I agitate continually for the first two minutes and then once every minute for 10 seconds. I find that I need to add about 20% developing time compared to rotary.

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Posts
    2,084

    Re: Tray development and Pyrocat

    I use 1:1:150 for xray film. Works quite alright, although the developer gets tired pretty quickly with continuous agitation (which is the only way I manage to get somewhat even development). I consider switching to 1:1:100 with a shorter development time. With normal films I use 1:1:100, but in tanks. I see no need to go higher (although I sometimes boost the activator by 20%) even when developing negs for Van Dyke brown printing.

  6. #6
    jp's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Maine
    Posts
    5,630

    Re: Tray development and Pyrocat

    I use 1:1:100 in a tray for 8x10 processing. Works fine. Just like the tank for 4x5, except it's dark. Doesn't last that long; I'd suggest tossing it after 30 minutes.

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Location
    North Dakota
    Posts
    1,329

    Re: Tray development and Pyrocat

    2:2:100 in a tray with brush development, one at a time. A tray of much warmer mixed Pyrocat HD is above it in case I need to pop things a touch. Green safelight to check on development. One of these days I'll have to get the infrared goggle setup.
    ” Never attribute to inspiration that which can be adequately explained by delusion”.

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    1,457

    Re: Tray development and Pyrocat

    1:1:100 tray with shuffle agitation for 4x5. Works the same as PMK, fractionally longer times.

  9. #9

    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Chicagoland
    Posts
    494

    Re: Tray development and Pyrocat

    Thanks for all the responses.
    I develop 6-8 sheets at a time continually shuffling slowly, about 5 seconds between sheets. My normal time is 10 minutes at 72 degrees. Ken I'll check out that site to try to understand the relationship between the different mixing ratios. It looks like the old saw about more ways to skin a cat is true.

  10. #10
    Steve Sherman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Central Connecticut
    Posts
    795

    Re: Tray development and Pyrocat

    Quote Originally Posted by Willie View Post
    2:2:100 in a tray with brush development, one at a time. A tray of much warmer mixed Pyrocat HD is above it in case I need to pop things a touch. Green safelight to check on development. One of these days I'll have to get the infrared goggle setup.
    Hello Willie, when I was using PMK (green stain) 15 years ago I used a Dark Green safelight to develop by inspection. I switched to Pyrocat HD (amber stain) exclusively about 13 years ago and in doing so found the Pyrocat negs quite difficult to gauge with the green safelight. Sandy King suggested to me that I switch to an Amber safelight, a # OC. I did so and the difference in being able to evaluate Pyrocat HD negs is considerably superior to PMK and the Green safelight.

    Just offering an alternative


    Real photographs are born wet !

    www.PowerOfProcessTips.com

Similar Threads

  1. Tray Development: Fix Filtering, Minimum Post-Development Processing
    By Harlan Chapman in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 27-Sep-2012, 02:16
  2. Pyrocat-HD and tray development
    By jvuokko in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 4-Jul-2011, 03:44
  3. Tray Development
    By Terry Hull in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 26-May-2009, 08:49
  4. Solution for tray development
    By cyrus in forum Darkroom: Equipment
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: 2-Oct-2006, 08:10
  5. Pyrocat HD (Jobo cpp2 vs tray development)
    By Bobby Sandstrom in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 24-Jul-2005, 13:29

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •