i was looking at the toyo 45cf as it seems very portable. i have also seen mixed reviews on it though so was looking for an alternative that could also keep the lens on and fold up/is portable and is also around the same price (~$980).
i was looking at the toyo 45cf as it seems very portable. i have also seen mixed reviews on it though so was looking for an alternative that could also keep the lens on and fold up/is portable and is also around the same price (~$980).
Here is a review of several competing brands that I found informative: http://www.toyoview.com/Products/45CF/JanEntry45CF.pdf I settled on the 45CF and never regretted the decision. It was my first LF camera purchase and one that I still use. All my subsequest LF camera purchases have been Toyo: technical fields 4x5 and 8x10 and studios 4x5 and 8x10. The 45CF has full movements on the front standard: rise/fall, tilt, swing and shift but lacks back movements except for bed-drop which simulates a back tilt movement. But really, that's all you really need in a lightweight, highly portable 4x5 field camera that the CF is. An added benefit of having such a lightweight portable 4x5 camera is that you don't need a heavier tripod. For backpacking and bicycle touring with it I use a series 0 Gitzo carbon fiber tripod ~ 2.5 lbs and with the head + QRP and folds-up small and compact. If you go that route, you must use a cable release.
Thomas
A little more money, a little heavier, but more versatile: Chamonix
-Dan
Stone Photo Gear
https://www.stonephotogear.com/
You'll probably find that every camera has mixed reviews. I'll throw out an alternative that also has mixed reviews: Horseman 45FA (also HD). Very compact and rugged, with geared rise and detents for most movements, but has a number of tradeoffs (Google will tell you all about them). I have a 135mm Sironar-N folded up in mine, which is an awesome light/compact setup.
I did an introductory video when I was still pretty new to the camera and LF (still pretty new to LF, and expect to be, for a while ): https://youtu.be/2X7na0TJgtk
However, I just got a Chamonix 045F1, mostly in order to have a single-lensboard standard amongst my quiver. The Chamonix is light and lovely, but I'm not sure I'll get on with the non-independent movements and lack of detents. Strikes me as fiddly. More variety in lens choices, though.
Trade-offs, always. Always!
Second vote for Chamonix!
Specifically this one in 4x5.
http://www.chamonixviewcamera.com/45.html
I will second a horseman! I love my 45HD. The HD does not have geared rise or back movements, but it is tuber coaxed and more rugged.
Watch mathomas' review. I did a few times before getting my horseman.
If you decide to part with your FA I may be interested
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Ira Summers
thank you for the suggestions. after looking at and learning about the horseman 45fa i think i will go with that. can anybody recommend a 150mm lens that will fit inside of it folded up?
The FA is very nice, but if you don't plan on using back movements the HD is a little cheaper, s light lighter, and a little more rugged. The HD is also much easier to find in good shape the an FA. They are nearly identical cameras though, so IMO you just can't go wrong with them.
As for lens, I'm not aware of any 150mm that will fit inside folded, but I could be wrong. I do know the rodenstock 135 sonar-n will fit perfectly in the 45HD and I'd assume FA too. This is the set up I started with and is great (though I now use fujinon glass and will be selling my HD and 135 whenever I get an FA.
Good luck and have fun!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Ira Summers
Bookmarks