What are you useing for Tech Pan Dev.

[StoneNYC]

P.O.T.A.

The system keeps auto-changing the letters to lower case, not sure why, so I added periods, but it's spelled without the periods.

[Tony Lakin]

After much experimentation this is the best I have found

http://www.monochromephotography.com...920_83802.html

[greginpa]

I've used TD-3. I was very happy with the results.

[EdSawyer]

I still have Technidol but good to know of the alternatives when the time comes.

[StoneNYC]

I use POTA because it basically is technidol to my understanding, I process it the same way, the results side by side were the same. So far as I could tell.

You can use any developer but you need a low contrast Dev to get the "normal" look from TP.

Sold off all my TP and technidol a few months ago, no time, it's fun but not necessarily usefully consistent as the price of used is high and storage from person to person is different.

Good luck!

[Michael Rosenberg]

For 120 film I have used X-Tol 1+5 or 1+6 (one shot) at 72F for 10 mins (N dev.) in Nikon reel tank using the agitation plan for POTA. I expose at ASA 60, and I get great results.

Mike

[Donald Qualls]

I've used Caffenol LC and Caffenol LC+C (low contrast versions of Caffenol) for microfilm stocks, including Adox CMS20, which are (relative to contrast and resolution, though not in spectral response) similar to Tech Pan. I prefer the non-staining LC+C version for this application, but it's worth testing both; preferences are very personal.

[redrockcoulee]

I still have Technidol but good to know of the alternatives when the time comes.

I have sufficient Technidol to process my two rolls of 135 and my box of 50 4X5.