When I had just my 14" lens (on 8x10) if I wanted to go long I'd simply get closer to my subject, for wide I'd back off---much like when using a fixed lens camera. Adding extra lenses to my kit usually came when physical limitations (such as cliffs) hindered my movement within a physical location.
"I would feel more optimistic about a bright future for man if he spent less time proving that he can outwit Nature and more time tasting her sweetness and respecting her seniority"---EB White
Once I discovered the immense joy of nearly total perspective control I never went back to one prime lens... or two or three or four.
I have one lens for my 5X7 which is THE lens. But I have a few others for when I need more or less.
No matter the format (35mm, 4X5, and especially 8X10), I believe I have to many lenses. Have been telling myself this for years. My reasons for wanting to greatly limit my lens collection is because I have gotten to know myself over the years.
I know that I lack the discipline to learn the "best" use for each lens.
I know that when I have fewer choices in the field, it benefits my image making, both in numbers, and in quality.
I know that I enjoy the picture taking experience much more when I am not distracted by lenses.
So, I usually try to take just two...usually...
I chose to shoot 8x10 with one lens for a year. It is a 375/6.3 Caltar. It was an interesting and growing experience. 8x10 lenses cost money I didn't have so I settled on the one lens and it has been fine. I'm still considering a "modern" lens with multi coating and a Copal shutter but just haven't got around to spending the money. I can't say that I think I'm missing anything.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks