Dear Oren Grad,
Could you please elaborate on your decision to remove my latest post in this thread as not LF?
That picture was made with a Linhof Technorama (bought in 1992) producing negatives measuring 6x17 cm which have a surface of 102 cm2 on an emulsion (Fomapan 100) which is exactly the item of this thread.
As you might know, a 4"x5" is measuring 125cm2, so don't tell me that a nearly 23 cm2 is really making that difference, seeing this in the light of the results, AND the demanding knowledge and experience to handel that kind of (panoramic-) camera.
BTW, the lens used is exactly the same as on a 'traditional' LF camera: Schneider-Kreuznach Super-Angulon 90mm F5.6.
Allow me to add, that due to health issues, I can't haul my Linhof Kardan GT 4x5 (bought in 1991) anymore around because I can't handel this one as it is to heavy, the Technorama has become my substitute LF now...
Also, I can't afford a lighter wooden folding LF and the more expensive sheet film, as my health forced me out of business after nearly 35 years of being a self employed professional photographer (working with 4"x5" and 13x18cm).
Regards,
Phdgent
www.photoeil.be
Bookmarks