Jim,
You win!
Actually, we all win.
Craig
Jim,
You win!
Actually, we all win.
Craig
Old-N-Feeble
sand? I'll have to check
Craig, yes we all win! But you have the pretty models to shoot!!
,Wow ,I am amazed at the response to this question , There are obviousely a lot of very passionate ULF shooters on this forum , I was asking the question really based on the experience of jumping from 5x4 to 5x8 and 8x10 , with each jump in format came restrictions and new challenges , And quite frankly improvements in technique were required , I find 4x5 far easier to shoot than 8x10 , So it got me thinking what about these guys shooting up to 16 x 20 where diffraction and D.O. F issues are multiplied , i don't think i will get the opportunity to try ULF here in Western Australia as the people shooting it here is Zero , But i will keep an open mind and if the opportunity arose i would give it a try
I am new in ULF 12x16", and your question is one, which I asked to myself after riding this beasts.
Life had been a bit easier before...
Enjoying the pure size, enjoying the wonderful lenses, this special feeling in using the big machine, the view of the groundglass, the feeling of the right photography for me,the "products" - this may be reasons enough to me.
But now it feels like I graded up my complete LF photography, that is a good reason to me.
And I want to start up with alternative processes by contacting next time - this has been the first reason.
Luckily, if I feel weak, I am able to shoot with 5x7" or 4x5".
A lot of fantastic options !
Cheers,
Ritchie
Lachlan.
You miss 100% of the shots you never take. -- Wayne Gretzky
because we are crazy...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fwI5By945R0
Thierry M.L.
Bookmarks