Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 15 of 15

Thread: PMK - how does it work?

  1. #11

    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Location
    Montreal, Canada
    Posts
    2,026

    Re: PMK - how does it work?

    I strongly suggest you invest in some new ingredients. The contents of that Kodak box (originally actually a mixture of bisulfite and metabisulfite) probably went bad a long, long time ago. These are not the most stable compounds to begin with.

    Alternatively you can simply purchase pre-mixed liquid PMK concentrates.

    Quote Originally Posted by Kimberly Anderson View Post
    Michael R....now *that* is what I was looking for. Thank you.

    BTW, here's what I used. I may have typed it wrong, but I believe the contents of the metal box are correct.

    Attachment 130319

  2. #12
    Analog Photographer Kimberly Anderson's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    658

    Re: PMK - how does it work?

    Thanks for the suggestion Michael, but I won't argue with how the negatives turned out last night. The film looks great.

  3. #13
    CropDusterMan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    Valley Center, CA
    Posts
    45

    Re: PMK - how does it work?

    Wow...that Sodium bisulfite can has to be older than I am. Would look cool on a shelf next to an old
    Graflex.

  4. #14
    IanG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Aegean (Turkey & UK)
    Posts
    4,122

    Re: PMK - how does it work?

    By now that Bisulphite will be almost total Sulphite. Your part A will have very poor keeping properties but it won't have made any noticeable difference as bas soom as you make up the working developer the Metaborate causes the Bisulphite to decompose to Sulphite anyway.

    Ian

  5. #15

    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Pugetopolis
    Posts
    3,147

    Re: PMK - how does it work?

    If you have not experimented with highlight compression and PMK, I would recommend it. The "Minus-X" development per Gordon's instructions work. You may need to tweak it with a little more time or little more exposure but: Place your low values, add 3 stops of exposure and cut your normal development time by 1/2. It perhaps works better with a figital work flow than wet printing one though.

    With the films I've tried, it works best with the tabular grain films such as 100ACR and 400TMY. You wouldn't want to do this on a heavy overcast day but on a sunny/partly cloudy day you don't even need a light meter anymore. That simple rule breaks down to the Sunny 11 rule for my geographic location and placing my shadows 3 or 4 stops below the middle gray. I seem to capture pretty much all the highlights mother nature can throw out and my shadows as placed.

    I've interpolate the time of that rule for two stops and now shoot 400TMY at EI100 for daylight conditions as my go-to film and get the benefit of more dynamic range, grain of 400 film about as fine as 100 film and using a waist level finder with no light meter. The more I do it the more I've learned when to tweak my exposure as I've gained experience.
    Last edited by tuco; 8-Mar-2015 at 10:16. Reason: spelling

Similar Threads

  1. What % of your work is in LF...4 x 5 and up?
    By slackercruster in forum On Photography
    Replies: 30
    Last Post: 14-Sep-2012, 17:07
  2. will this work for me..?
    By Frank_E in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 16-Nov-2009, 18:03
  3. So how does this work ?
    By davidb in forum Cameras & Camera Accessories
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 11-Sep-2007, 08:42
  4. Why Would This Not Work?
    By Joe Lacy in forum Cameras & Camera Accessories
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 26-Dec-2001, 11:07
  5. where can i see your work?
    By james norman in forum On Photography
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 2-Aug-2000, 00:13

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •