A buddy wasn't sure if he'd like the concept of using a soft focus lens as a landscape lens.
He mounted one of my 250mm f:4.2 Wollastons on his 4x5 Graflex to photo a covered bridge.
One was shot almost wide open, @ f:5.6, the other shot @ f:11.
Late afternoon sidelight, light hazy sky overhead.
His first reaction was that the f:5.6 negative was useless "mush" and almost threw it away.
After adjusting for printing contrast, here's how they compared...
He wasn't sure which one he favored, so he'd like your opinion.
Reinhold
www.re-inventedPhtoEquip.com
Bookmarks