For me its 165mm (a reasonably compact one, so no S.A.) - for 4x5 and especially 5x7 formats. Would fit perfectly between my 120 and 210. Yes, I know that there are some fine older lenses of this FL, with wonderful and unique signatures. But frankly I'm more after something consistent with my other, more "modern" lenses, to facilitate equal consistency in my overall visualization/processing protocol. And no, a 150 or 180 will not cut it. I really need a 165!
So I'm curious...if anyone else faces this dilemma - of having a pressing need for a particular focal length (or lengths) of modern vintage, which simply does not exist.
Bookmarks