Page 3 of 9 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 86

Thread: Several Soft Focus lenses compared

  1. #21

    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Maryland
    Posts
    1,492

    Re: Several Soft Focus lenses compared

    I think I like the Wollaston the most, of the three lenses compared.

  2. #22

    Re: Several Soft Focus lenses compared

    Arrival of my Wollaston last week started the comparison.
    I agree with Dan
    Good thing that these are readily available from Reinhold.

  3. #23

    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    South Texas
    Posts
    1,837

    Re: Several Soft Focus lenses compared

    RE Imagon discs: I don't like them. I'll only use the shutter's built-in aperture. Those Imagon "strainer" discs completely destroy bokeh, IMHO. I'll never understand why the discs were made that way. Otherwise the Imagon is a beautiful portrait lens.

  4. #24
    Mark Sawyer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Stuck inside of Tucson with the Neverland Blues again...
    Posts
    6,269

    Re: Several Soft Focus lenses compared

    Quote Originally Posted by mdarnton View Post
    Mark, your astigmatism comment doesn't make sense, unless you have an improperly ground lens. Explain, please.
    Astigmatism is one of the seven deadly sins, I mean seven primary aberrations, in lenses. It causes lenses to be slightly sharper on one axis than on the perpendicular axis. The Zeiss Anastigmat/Protar of 1890 was the first anastigmat, so any design that pre-dates it has astigmatism to some degree. I just thought I saw a lot more than is usually noticeable, but Jac@stafford.net could be right...

    Quote Originally Posted by Jac@stafford.net View Post
    Mark, could this be due to the requirement to have stronger contrast in the lighting? The light intensity is dropping in the 2-8 position. Just wondering.
    That could be too... never try to analyze a lens after a couple of late night martinis!
    "I love my Verito lens, but I always have to sharpen everything in Photoshop..."

  5. #25

    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    1,856

    Re: Several Soft Focus lenses compared

    Astigmatism should be rendered concentrically, not linear in a particular line. That is, both legs of an X won't be simultaneously in focus, and both arms of a + wouldn't either, with the same lens. If the lens is made spherically, there shouldn't be a particular axis for this--it's simply relative, that any two lines perpendicular to each other can't be in focus at the same time.
    Thanks, but I'd rather just watch:
    Large format: http://flickr.com/michaeldarnton
    Mostly 35mm: http://flickr.com/mdarnton
    You want digital, color, etc?: http://www.flickr.com/photos/stradofear

  6. #26

    Re: Several Soft Focus lenses compared

    I have to say that I am not yet a fan of the Imagon strainer, but I will give myself a chance to learn how to use it.

  7. #27
    Mark Sawyer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Stuck inside of Tucson with the Neverland Blues again...
    Posts
    6,269

    Re: Several Soft Focus lenses compared

    Here's an example of the astigmatism I was referring to. One axis in focus, one not:
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Screenshot (23) copy.jpg  
    "I love my Verito lens, but I always have to sharpen everything in Photoshop..."

  8. #28

    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    1,856

    Re: Several Soft Focus lenses compared

    Now turn that target 45 degrees, so that the angle is between that example, focus on the lines going in one direction and see how the others look. Or for that matter, set up the same target and focus on the other set. No matter what the orientation, one pair should be in focus, the other not, and you should be able to choose which one to focus on.
    Thanks, but I'd rather just watch:
    Large format: http://flickr.com/michaeldarnton
    Mostly 35mm: http://flickr.com/mdarnton
    You want digital, color, etc?: http://www.flickr.com/photos/stradofear

  9. #29

    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    AZ
    Posts
    4,431

    Re: Several Soft Focus lenses compared

    I can't turn it! I CAN'T turn IT! Aaahhhh..... (too many martinis too)

  10. #30

    Re: Several Soft Focus lenses compared

    I just read some 3 year old posts and I learned something. I can disassemble the Imagon from it's barrel and put it into an old Compur # 3 shutter. Now I have some more options.

Similar Threads

  1. Soft Focus. Spencer Portland ~ Gundlach Hyperion Compared
    By Jim Galli in forum Image Sharing (LF) & Discussion
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 6-May-2014, 20:54
  2. Imagon & Wollensak Extreme Soft Focus compared
    By Don Dudenbostel in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 7-Mar-2012, 14:36
  3. 7 Antique Soft Focus Portrait Lenses Compared
    By Jim Galli in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 55
    Last Post: 24-Jan-2008, 15:24
  4. Portraiture with Soft/FX -3 vs soft focus lenses?
    By Michael Heald in forum Style & Technique
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 17-Oct-2007, 10:08
  5. soft focus lenses
    By gary s barr in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 17-Jan-2001, 16:36

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •