It appears the back rotates??
Yes this is great camera. We compered Canham 8x10 and Svedovsky 8x10 side by side (author of the review is using wooden Canham 8x10 since two years). Off course Canham have more movements, but if you compere stability and rigidness Svedovsky is clear winner. Hubert’s Canham after 2 years of usage is showing some minor gimmicks (small “cracks” in the glued parts of wooden frame). Svedovsky’s wooden parts are much more robust. And yes, maybe the camera is not so pretty when you compared to Chamonix or Canham (not mention Ebony) but it is true work horse, my first and last 8x10
Michal Makowski
I wouldn't be surprised if it kicked out Chamonix from the market, at least in Europe. And with the Czech Cassiopeia camera there is what to choose from. Well done!
http://svedovsky.com/
The web site is finally working.
Regards
Michal
Michal Makowski
Looks very nice... I've been thinking about the Chamonix 8x10, but it looks like Svedovsky 8x10 would be more than good enough for me. I'd like a 5x7 reducing back, though.
i don't see why people are all ga ga about some camera made in some far off place when we already have the best camera made right here in the USA..that's right; buy a Ritter 8x10 and know you can get it serviced anytime/anywhere
it looks like a clumsy box to me...nothing new here at all...
have a nice day
peter
Bookmarks