Actually, I'm expecting the Spanish Inquisition. They're late.
Pentax 645z = $8,500, + 55mm ($1,200) + 75mm ($700) = appx $10,500, call it $11,000 with accessories like memory cards and whatnot.
Call it $4.00 per sheet for color 4x5, $2.50 per sheet for development, not including postage = $6.50 per sheet. $11,000 / $6.50 = 1,692.
The reason I pick the Pentax 645 digital system is because that's the minimum that I would go with if I were to forgo film. That's my standard, and I'm sticking with it. The "full frame" DSLR cameras are far too big, while the Pentax is just right. I'm not including post processing steps because both of them require it, and the labor is dependent on what image it is. This is about the acquisition of the image, and that's all.
This past weekend I exposed 24 sheets of color. Now, if I did that for a year then 52 * 24 = 1,248. But I don't get out that much. I wish that I did. But if I did, then I'd buy a 645z in a trice, and it would have earned its keep in a bit over 16 months.
Now, what of quality? I get a decent-enough-for-me-and-my-Epson-2200 126Mp scan with my Epson 750 from a 6x4.5cm piece of film. But that's 2x what I'd get from the 645z. And Lenny scans at 4000dpi, for 320Mp. Now, if I want to get large with a print, like Gursky, then that's a bit of a difference between the two. 50Mp won't cut it. And I have printed 4x5 Techpan on 16x20, and that's just really it for me. I know the quality of the medium that I want.
Bookmarks