Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 15

Thread: Ilford FB Classic and FB Cooltone review

  1. #1

    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    19

    Ilford FB Classic and FB Cooltone review

    I've been playing around with a few sheets of each of the new papers and posted some early impressions here.

    Bottom line? They're beautiful papers and I can't wait to get some more!


    The Gate. FB Classic, Mamiya Press 6x9

  2. #2
    Drew Wiley
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    SF Bay area, CA
    Posts
    18,406

    Re: Ilford FB Classic and FB Cooltone review

    I put my initial impressions on a previous thread. I still have some basic experimenting I want to do on the Cooltone before I get involved with the Neutral version,
    but am particularly interested in how these two products compare relative to toning.

  3. #3
    Drew Wiley
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    SF Bay area, CA
    Posts
    18,406

    Re: Ilford FB Classic and FB Cooltone review

    Having just read your complete online review, about all I can say is that Cooltone does have a distinct amt of drydown, equivalent approximately to MGWT. It's an
    undeniable factor.

  4. #4

    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    19

    Re: Ilford FB Classic and FB Cooltone review

    Quote Originally Posted by Drew Wiley View Post
    Having just read your complete online review, about all I can say is that Cooltone does have a distinct amt of drydown, equivalent approximately to MGWT. It's an
    undeniable factor.
    Thanks for pointing that out Drew. I have to say that I never noticed much dry down to speak of in either of the prints I made but I'll do a test for it when I get some more paper.

  5. #5
    Drew Wiley
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    SF Bay area, CA
    Posts
    18,406

    Re: Ilford FB Classic and FB Cooltone review

    It's going to be a bit of a learning curve for me, because with this paper it's a very fine line between almost pure white and very subtly detailed high-key greys.
    So you can either win or lose the entire ballgame on very minor differences of exposure, and it's really hard to judge until complete drydown, though heat-drying a
    test strip obviously gives a clue. I'm fairly amazed at how much fine detail can be held in the high zones. The DMax might not knock your sox off like it can with
    MGWT, but is distinctly better than MGIV, with excellent gradation in the shadows too. I don't know if this will turn out to be an A+ paper for me like MGWT, but
    it definitely deserves a solid A- at a minimum on the report card. But it takes awhile to fairly judge anything new. It is a damn easy paper to print, once you get used
    to the FAST speed.

  6. #6

    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    19

    Re: Ilford FB Classic and FB Cooltone review

    Quote Originally Posted by Drew Wiley View Post
    It's going to be a bit of a learning curve for me, because with this paper it's a very fine line between almost pure white and very subtly detailed high-key greys.
    So you can either win or lose the entire ballgame on very minor differences of exposure, and it's really hard to judge until complete drydown, though heat-drying a
    test strip obviously gives a clue. I'm fairly amazed at how much fine detail can be held in the high zones. The DMax might not knock your sox off like it can with
    MGWT, but is distinctly better than MGIV, with excellent gradation in the shadows too. I don't know if this will turn out to be an A+ paper for me like MGWT, but
    it definitely deserves a solid A- at a minimum on the report card. But it takes awhile to fairly judge anything new. It is a damn easy paper to print, once you get used
    to the FAST speed.
    I agree that it's important to be on the money where the correct exposure time is concerned but I found it easy to get a couple of nice prints done without much bother which is always a good sign. I wanted to get the highlight on the white paintwork on The gate just right and managed it OK. I never noticed any dry down effect on this highlight which is why I said I didn't see any. But I've only done a couple of prints and it might well be the case that if I pay more attention to this aspect I'll see it too. You certainly seem to be more familiar with the paper than I am.

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Westport Island, Maine
    Posts
    1,236

    Re: Ilford FB Classic and FB Cooltone review

    Quote Originally Posted by Drew Wiley View Post
    Having just read your complete online review, about all I can say is that Cooltone does have a distinct amt of drydown, equivalent approximately to MGWT. It's an
    undeniable factor.
    Drydown is a simple test. That said, betcha it's 10%.
    Bruce Barlow
    author of "Finely Focused" and "Exercises in Photographic Composition"
    www.brucewbarlow.com

  8. #8

    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    19

    Re: Ilford FB Classic and FB Cooltone review

    I just noticed that I posted the URL of my blog's home page rather than the URL of the actual Ilford review in my first message. Sorry for that. You'll get something different if you go there now so here's the review URL:

    http://www.theonlinedarkroom.com/201...one-first.html



    Quote Originally Posted by Ektar View Post
    I've been playing around with a few sheets of each of the new papers and posted some early impressions here.

    Bottom line? They're beautiful papers and I can't wait to get some more!


    The Gate. FB Classic, Mamiya Press 6x9

  9. #9
    Drew Wiley
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    SF Bay area, CA
    Posts
    18,406

    Re: Ilford FB Classic and FB Cooltone review

    Bruce, 10% is a probably a realistic factor, but with a paper like this, capable of bringing detail well up the scale, very small differences can distinguish between a good print and a great one. So I won't abandon my habit of making minor variations in printing, then evaluating them after a complete air drydown when my eyes are fresh. Drying test strips gets close, but doesn't always hit the nail squarely on the head. Unfortunately, I've gotten some richness of detail that would probably be difficult to appreciate if the print were even framed under glass - really delicate, the kind of thing where you want to hold the print in your hands. And the paper seems rather resistant to selective bleaching with Farmers, but I state that tentatively, because my experimenting is needed. But if this proves true, one more reason to hit those highlights exactly. ... not that I'm claiming this paper is difficult to use. It isn't. It just gives one more control in the highlights than MGIV did.

  10. #10

    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    19

    Re: Ilford FB Classic and FB Cooltone review

    Quote Originally Posted by Drew Wiley View Post
    Bruce, 10% is a probably a realistic factor, but with a paper like this, capable of bringing detail well up the scale, very small differences can distinguish between a good print and a great one. So I won't abandon my habit of making minor variations in printing, then evaluating them after a complete air drydown when my eyes are fresh. Drying test strips gets close, but doesn't always hit the nail squarely on the head. Unfortunately, I've gotten some richness of detail that would probably be difficult to appreciate if the print were even framed under glass - really delicate, the kind of thing where you want to hold the print in your hands. And the paper seems rather resistant to selective bleaching with Farmers, but I state that tentatively, because my experimenting is needed. But if this proves true, one more reason to hit those highlights exactly. ... not that I'm claiming this paper is difficult to use. It isn't. It just gives one more control in the highlights than MGIV did.
    If FB Cooltone were a woman, I'd swear that you had a wee thing going for her, Drew.

Similar Threads

  1. Initial Impression: Ilford MGFB IV vs MGFB Classic
    By Eric Biggerstaff in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 11-Jan-2014, 07:37
  2. Ilford Hypam vs. Ilford Rapid Fixer
    By brian steinberger in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 19-Aug-2013, 13:39
  3. Anyone using Ilford warm & cooltone paper developers?
    By brian steinberger in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 31-May-2006, 06:33
  4. Anyone else going to Review Santa Fe?
    By chris jordan in forum Groups & Meetings
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 7-Jul-2005, 07:55
  5. review web sites
    By Raymond Bleesz in forum Resources
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 6-Aug-2001, 14:18

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •