Originally Posted by
DannL
Ryan,
You're on the right track. Don't worry about the occasional rock-in-the-road. They're inevitable. We just go around them, and continue on our way.
Of topic . . . With regard to the web-site you mentioned, for myself, I am not particularly keen on "modern distressed photography". Obviously being contrived, the "special effects" immediately take away from the image. The first thing I notice is the grunge and distressed appearance that was intentionally added to "impress the viewer". I'm sure it has a following. I'm just not in that group. And now on to the intent of my post . . .
I can't tell you what modern papers will give you the character that you seek for your contact prints, but I have collected a small number of "original prints" from the period mentioned. Most are portraits by well known portrait artists of the time. I'm sure you are aware that a vintage photograph rarely has the appearance of a "modern print" that have been distressed. That's probably why modern prints look like they were made yesterday. ;-) Anyhoo, I'd be glad to provide details of the characteristics of the papers they used, image characteristics, their current visual appearance, and I could provide scans if that helps. My own attempts to impart a "vintage character" to contact prints "without intentionally distressing" the image, has culminated in coating my own plates. So far, I am very pleased with the progress made in that direction. I just wish I had more time to play.
One characteristic of many vintage photographs is that the current color of the paper that was used is almost exactly the color of a manilla file folder. If you can match that color your doing quite well. That color probably differs a bit from the color of the paper when it was first used. The color of Sepia toning and a non-gloss surface are also very common characteristics for many vintage photographs.
Bookmarks