Teal Pond at -2F. TriX, yellow filter, 80mm lens. As a test I scanned the film on my Epson 850 with both dry and wet scans. It seemed that the histogram needed less adjusting in the wet mode, but with tweaking the dry mode was all but indistinguishable. As for sharpness, I think the wet scans appeared sharper by a tiny bit because the default histogram in wet mode was closest to the desired contrast. Does this seem familiar to others? (I used 3200dpi and Unsharp Mask Low -opinions on these too?)
[IMG]TealPond N6 wet LFF by John Olsen, on Flickr[/IMG]
Reply With Quote
Originally Posted by h2oman
Bookmarks