Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Longer focal length Artars

  1. #1

    Longer focal length Artars

    I have heard that the longer Artars (and red dot versions)-longer than 890mm- did not come in shutters. Can anyone confirm/refute this? Also has anyone put such a lens into a new shutter?

    Thanks

    Alan Barton

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Dec 1998
    Location
    Sierra Madre, California
    Posts
    61

    Longer focal length Artars

    The good folks at S.K. Grimes have successfully inserted a 42 inch Artar into a #5 shutter; see

    http://www.skgrimes.com/lenspics/42artar.jpg

    Looks like the beast would require a sturdy front standard, and the photographer would need really long arms.....

  3. #3

    Longer focal length Artars

    Although Goerz sold many of their Red Dot Artars in shutter, I am not aware or them doing so in any of the longer focal lengths (30" +).

    Putting a massive optic like a long Red Dot Artar in any shutter can be done with some machining at a cost of around $700+. However, I would offer a much less expensive albeit as effective alternative as a front mounted Packard shutter at less than half the cost. Lets face it. These lenses are not regularly used on anything smaller than 11x14 and as a result, reciprocity is your middle name in the f90 domain and 50-100 ASA film. So why even spend the money to attain less than one second exposure when you will seldon will need it. A good bulb and a second hand on your watch and you are good to go. That is what I am doing with my 35" Red Dot Artar.

    Lee Filter will custom make polyester B&W filters for you in any size you need at a reasonable cost. Save your money for what you really need in these ULF formats - film.

    Cheers!

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    South Carolina
    Posts
    5,506

    Longer focal length Artars

    I have a 42" Red Dot Artar in an Ilex #5 Shutter and a 35" Red Dot Artar in Copal #3, both put in shutter by machine work from S. K. Grimes. Both lenses are very heavy and would indeed benefit from a sturdy front standard or use of a monopod under the lens.

    Michael' s suggestion to use a front mounted Packard is very practical and will save you a lot of money. These long lense are items that you will not use very often, and when you do you will be using them in conditions that will require fairly long exposures. Even a lens cap might serve well with lenses of this focla length in the great majority of conditions.
    For discussion and information about carbon transfer please visit the carbon group at groups.io
    [url]https://groups.io/g/carbon

Similar Threads

  1. focal length...8x10
    By Percy in forum Cameras & Camera Accessories
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 18-Mar-2006, 01:29
  2. Focal Length of APO Nikkor 305
    By jonathan smith in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 30-May-2002, 07:05
  3. What focal length for Horseman VHR
    By David Flockhart in forum Cameras & Camera Accessories
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 18-May-2002, 00:09
  4. Do you need addtional exposure for longer focal lengths
    By James Phillips in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 14-Jan-2002, 11:05
  5. The longer focal length lens didn't allow me to get closer !
    By Ron Whitaker in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 18-Oct-2000, 09:53

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •