Maybe I'm clueless but...................................
At both universities I teach at I get to use top of the line Eizo's. I also have friends with virtually every high end wide gamut monitor out there. Great. But I never spend the bucks on a top of the line monitor because frankly I CAN'T SEE THE DIFFERENCE. I went from the old Lacie Blues to a Lacie 319 and just bought and received, setup and ran a couple of jobs on Dell Ultrasharps. Yes I can SEE the difference in resolution, but that makes NO difference in how I process images. Actual images on wide gamut monitors don't look any different IME vs. a midrange or even lower end graphics monitor. When printing I don't get any closer to a perfect soft proof with a high end wide gamut monitor. What value is the extra $s beyond bragging rights?
What am I missing?
Bookmarks