A lovely website with very good photographs, however, I am troubled by the striking similarity between this site and Paul Schilliger's in concept and design. Mr. Ozgoren's elaboration on his "Approach" within the technical articles, for instance, seems to be almost transcribed directly from Mr. Schilliger's site.
There are some really nice compositions there but either the scans or the actual prints have interferred with the sharpness that my monitor is able to provide. Quite fuzzy in some places.
Rory you are right! Incredible! This blatant plagiarism cheapens the site for me. How can anyone do this and have pride of work! Never mind that the concept and design was lifted as well! Yikes, where is the originality in thought and emotion. Paul should be told!
"The sincerest form of flattery," as they say. If you think Bulent's website is good, check out http://www.paulschilliger.com/.
I apologise for the almost transcribed text, especially from Mr Schilliger and the community. I am not very good in words especially in English and I must have been over influenced by Mr Schilliger's feelings and words which seemed like coming from my own mind. I am changing the text as soon as possible.
You also owe an apology to:
Mark Council (http://www.naturephotographs.com/)
and Craig Wells (http://www.tranquilityimages.com/about.shtml) who's words still grace your front page.
Google is a wonderful tool for this sort of thing.
... not to mention: http://www.kimweston.com/workshops/workshop8x10.htm Vs http://www.bulentozgoren.com/4_5_workshop_eng.htm ...
and even parts of his Biog: http://www.ordovergallery.com/holmes.htm Vs http://www.bulentozgoren.com/bio.htm
Hmmm - I think Larry Gebhardt has found me a new hobby....
Cheers,
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks