SEEE....aint' that flippin' Purfekt!!!!
man...
WITH the recessed board I can onlhy get 28" from the lens...dammit...didn't think them rails are differnet...THEN you findout...
well..14" ain't...
Type: Posts; User: johnielvis; Keyword(s):
SEEE....aint' that flippin' Purfekt!!!!
man...
WITH the recessed board I can onlhy get 28" from the lens...dammit...didn't think them rails are differnet...THEN you findout...
well..14" ain't...
ahhhh...actually ,then it WORKS both waysQ!!!!! hay hay
damit..
that actually was a poe story...toby dammit....always said "dammit".....anybody read tDAT one?
????????
awwwwww hell....
thought I'd make me a perfect portrait camera with the 11x14 studio..NOPE!!!!
had an EXTRA bellows frame for the front standard...rigged it ALL up...thought I'd have the lens...
yeah...he's on to it
you can't git de bokough bokah witOUT de blur!!! what you did is a depth of field test
you want the close up in focus and far back out of focus bocoup boka....
DIN you...
I'd cut it like a can opener and make a new threaded front mount for the barrel...cut from outside with nice precision tool and you don't mess up the glass...of course i've never done it, but that's...
swirl....dunno about dat...every meniscus I've had dont' sworl...you need something that produces the asitmatism for that I guess....
sort of like beer goggles
actually it's what the film "sees"...it has different spectral sensitivity than the eye does...usually for most peeps
chemical focus is what you get when you drink....
rome is burning.....
actually I like that...."fiddle"
ai'nt that as larry calls it a "stradibarius"????? 3 stooges
ZAM...man THAT's what I'm talkin' about....whooo weeee..
I LIKE DAT!
HELL YEAH!
mmmmmmmmm mmmmmmmmmph
NICE...thanks for the link
you know...maybe that was filmed under infrared for "real" developing, you know...the faces looked washed out kind of in the darkroom scene
I thought at first it was "faked" but...hey...maybe the...
the "focus beams" are an attachment that goes on the rangefinder and projects light OUT of the rangefinder onto the subject...you line the 2 beams up into 1 and you got focus in the dark.
I...
if it's protected from the environment, then there's no problem with storing in the darkroom....
that being said, I find my best protection from the darkroom environment is OUT of the darkroom
203 ektar will work smashingly--AND you can use it for a camera lens
if you got one laying around THAT's the ticket
it's just that it's f7.7 and not as bright as a componon lens--but the repro...
OR....MY trick...laserpointer ON the ground glass...it does the graflex rangefinder light focus thing but with blur....you focus on the spot! it works dude
??????????
no way
it's stopped down then
what lens?
you get a flashlight and put it in the scene and you see if you can focus---cause that's what you gotta do sometimes when there's no light.
...
crown--man....65 is about as wide as I'd go
gowlandFLEX is no way a wide camera unless you can find 4x5 retrofocus lenses
gowland pocket it teeny tiny and maybe able to do wides, but not like a...
fHAAHAHAHAHA
now I know WHY.....the people here...
now I know....metal thing up the backside...
yup....can't be menopause....it's all men....must be the metal thing
KOOL!!!!! just downloaded it....I like old movies and when they're about photography...hey....even better!!!! talk about "combining hobbies" ...excellent...got something to watch tonite. THANKS
hey...I got a dead one too...you fix these? how much for a fix..mine will charge and hold a full pop of charge-so it's not the cap...it pops one time and then....forget it...it'll re-charge and then...
hey--nice--really like these
were these lit with strobes or what? v.sharp...what's the exposure time if not strobes?
THAT BE THE ONE!!!!!!!
you know...I believe I actualy SAW this web page before too a long time ago and I remember seeing that...man...
yeah...that's what I thought---REALLY looked like it, but it looks like conanw's link is IT...three spaces down and it's JUST like mine---"older" cambo viewer....
I see it attaching to a plastic...
looks similar--but what about these buttons on the end with the grab hooks...or did maybe calumet adapt sinar ones for some special back adapter???
it LOOKS like the one in the calumet catalog...
well...the 1995 calumet catalog says that the thing I got is a cambo---keh listed it as a calumet....my calumets have the cambo backs and I have that OTHER reflex viewer too--the one for one eye...
I got this from KEH--it said calumet binocular reflex viewer (no eyepieces)....
anyways..I got it and have been using it on a gowlandflex and graflex slr
now comes time I want to actually put...
65 IS superwide on 4x5...you need newer ones to cover 4x5 though...the 65 f8 superangulon JUST barely covers stopped down
THIS one really grabbed me...even when I was scrolling down...this is the kind you STOP and look...lot to that one...yeah...this you can look at a while.
Cobbler pic is my pick today--yes I do like that.
HE:Y....what about ultrasonic--like they use ultrasonic to clean tools---THAT can give the best agitation maybe right? seems to do a good job cleaning....just keep the amplitude low enough to keep...
no...I meant just post the full ILLUMINATION coverage with targets shot at the entire illumination field---then you can see for yourself and judge for yourself what's acceptable, you know....just...
centrifugal processing...ahhh yesh....don't think it could work for processing--but something like a cylinder in cylinder...VERY: close together..leaving a very thin annular ring to put in the film...
you know--you'd think that by now, with all the lens testing the people seem to do on their own...who knows how many times a lens was tested for this or that --same lens, buy different people--all...
when I replaced mine with the package I still have for reference--these screws were labelled as
#4-40
so that's #4 size and 40 threads per inch
only metric there? too bad
what is foxing? I just saw a lens described as having it.....waviness is seen?>>
is this some kind of coating issue or something?
GOTIT
....see the other thread on processing equipment....
I figureed out you need 100% contact with the developing/rinse fluid to get off the anit-halation layer----this means S L O W rotation...
well...I see the thanks for solving a problem that's been plaguing people since the invention of film are starting to pour right int...
to all of you...you're welcome...use my ideas (and you will)...
WHOA...new idea!!!!!
the ridges in the tubes that are meant to hold the sheets around the circumference....IF I cut out sections of them, THEN the leading edge of the film can act like a SCOOP and...