Search:

I've enjoyed looking at the variety of excellent postings here, especially those made with historic alternative processes.
So here's a close-up I made of a vintage sewing maching which was part of...

244373
palladium print from 8x10 negative

I've been using the "legacy pro L-110" version of HC 110 which has worked just fine for me. It's not a savings over kodak's HC110 but its easily available eg at B&H for $17 for 16 ounces.

I've been using 8x10 FOMA 400 for a few years, exposing @200, developing in HC-110 1:31 and have been very happy with the results. I've never seen defects from manufacturing or packaging and my...

I'd be potentially interested but not yet ready to commit to purchase
Marty

Hi All-Am having a show of 11 platinum/palladium 8x10 + 7x17 images of NJ's Asbury Park at SohoPhoto Gallery in NYC. Please see the attached announcement + come by if you can!
Thanks-Marty...

I would contact Penumbra in NYC-a great resource for all things in alternative process. I'll bet they can direct you towards help

Not really. Much of the grain is especially seen in the sky + clouds.
All of these responses have been helpful so thanks to all!

Is it possible that one of the effects of using a glass negative carrier for 4x5 negatives is enhanced appearance of grain compared to glassless carriers? My recently employed carrier on my beselar...