+ both enlargers wall-mounted, on the same wall and next to each other
+ class carrier in both enlargers (does not matter in this test since USAF target is on glass substrate)
0 No paper under...
Type: Posts; User: henpe; Keyword(s):
+ both enlargers wall-mounted, on the same wall and next to each other
+ class carrier in both enlargers (does not matter in this test since USAF target is on glass substrate)
0 No paper under...
I made prints on RC paper and then inspected the prints using my eye, but also with a x40 stereo-loupe. When focusing the enlargers, I used both my Peak and my Bestwell Optics Micro-Sight (they both...
A short follow-up.
I have not tested my taking lenses yet, but I did run a few tests on my enlargers and found some interesting results.
I was able to acquire a transparency USAF 1951 resolution...
Sorry for my silence; been too busy the latest couple of days.
Just to clarify. I did a test to verify that the GG vs film-plane distance is ok. For that purpose I built a test-rig, see below
...
Thank you all for your inputs, much appreciated!
Sounds like a good idea to make comparative tests in which as many variables as possible have been eliminated/harmonized between the formats. First...
Dear all,
I just want to share my latest findings on the difference, if any, in quality between my MF and LF work.
During last couple of years I have almost exclusively been using my 4x5 LF...