Search:

Type: Posts; User: henpe; Keyword(s):

Search: Search took 0.00 seconds.

  1. Replies
    46
    Views
    10,187

    Re: My LF-prints less crisp compared to my MF

    + both enlargers wall-mounted, on the same wall and next to each other
    + class carrier in both enlargers (does not matter in this test since USAF target is on glass substrate)
    0 No paper under...
  2. Replies
    46
    Views
    10,187

    Re: My LF-prints less crisp compared to my MF

    I made prints on RC paper and then inspected the prints using my eye, but also with a x40 stereo-loupe. When focusing the enlargers, I used both my Peak and my Bestwell Optics Micro-Sight (they both...
  3. Replies
    46
    Views
    10,187

    Re: My LF-prints less crisp compared to my MF

    A short follow-up.

    I have not tested my taking lenses yet, but I did run a few tests on my enlargers and found some interesting results.
    I was able to acquire a transparency USAF 1951 resolution...
  4. Replies
    46
    Views
    10,187

    Re: My LF-prints less crisp compared to my MF

    Sorry for my silence; been too busy the latest couple of days.

    Just to clarify. I did a test to verify that the GG vs film-plane distance is ok. For that purpose I built a test-rig, see below
    ...
  5. Replies
    46
    Views
    10,187

    Re: My LF-prints less crisp compared to my MF

    Thank you all for your inputs, much appreciated!

    Sounds like a good idea to make comparative tests in which as many variables as possible have been eliminated/harmonized between the formats. First...
  6. Replies
    46
    Views
    10,187

    My LF-prints less crisp compared to my MF

    Dear all,

    I just want to share my latest findings on the difference, if any, in quality between my MF and LF work.

    During last couple of years I have almost exclusively been using my 4x5 LF...
Results 1 to 6 of 6