Page 90 of 655 FirstFirst ... 40808889909192100140190590 ... LastLast
Results 891 to 900 of 6546

Thread: Use of X-ray film: technical discussion with example images

  1. #891
    mat4226's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Columbus, OH
    Posts
    146

    Re: Images shot on X-ray film

    IMO, hangers and tanks are the best way to develop this film:



    Eastman Commercial B 8x10 + Fujinon 210mm
    Kodak Green X-ray film + Obisidian Aqua 1:500

  2. #892
    Corran's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    North GA Mountains
    Posts
    8,937

    Re: Images shot on X-ray film

    Holden, you seem to really nail your development. I've recently gone back to the drawing board with the Fuji green-sensitive stuff to try to tame the highlights. The green sensitivity really screws with the contrast sometimes when I'm not expecting it, especially with sky in the photo - even when the negative looks good the contrast is too high. Well anyway, here's a couple sheets from yesterday:



    Bryan | Blog | YouTube | Instagram | Portfolio
    All comments and thoughtful critique welcome

  3. #893

    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Central North Carolina
    Posts
    362

    Re: Images shot on X-ray film

    Quote Originally Posted by Corran View Post
    Holden, you seem to really nail your development. I've recently gone back to the drawing board with the Fuji green-sensitive stuff to try to tame the highlights. The green sensitivity really screws with the contrast sometimes when I'm not expecting it, especially with sky in the photo - even when the negative looks good the contrast is too high. Well anyway, here's a couple sheets from yesterday:

    Hey,
    Let me say both of these images are compelling. I like the comps and the location, and yes, highlights are usually bit blown in landscape shooting using ortho, So my goal is to get it to behave more like regular film generally. I saw some earlier 1+200 development in this thread and its beautiful So I'll go that route for a bit. With Rodinal you may not need a restrainer but with HC110 you definitely do,
    H

  4. #894
    Large Format Rocks ImSoNegative's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    McCaysville Georgia
    Posts
    1,617

    Re: Images shot on X-ray film

    Quote Originally Posted by mat4226 View Post
    IMO, hangers and tanks are the best way to develop this film:



    Eastman Commercial B 8x10 + Fujinon 210mm
    Kodak Green X-ray film + Obisidian Aqua 1:500
    very nice portrait! i dont have hangers or tanks but after several on top of several sheets scratched, fingerprinted, yada yada, I learned that by putting glass in the bottom of the trays and wearing gloves when loading and unloading film, and dont squeegie, my film has been mark free now for about 8 sheets. again that is a very nice portrait.
    "WOW! Now thats a big camera. By the way, how many megapixels is that thing?"

  5. #895
    Large Format Rocks ImSoNegative's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    McCaysville Georgia
    Posts
    1,617

    Re: Images shot on X-ray film

    Here is one I did about a week ago, shot with a calumet c1, 19in. red dot artar wide open, green xray. a few dust bunnies


    Rebecca by J. Golden, on Flickr
    "WOW! Now thats a big camera. By the way, how many megapixels is that thing?"

  6. #896
    Corran's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    North GA Mountains
    Posts
    8,937

    Re: Images shot on X-ray film

    Quote Originally Posted by Holdenrichards View Post
    Hey,
    Let me say both of these images are compelling. I like the comps and the location, and yes, highlights are usually bit blown in landscape shooting using ortho, So my goal is to get it to behave more like regular film generally. I saw some earlier 1+200 development in this thread and its beautiful So I'll go that route for a bit. With Rodinal you may not need a restrainer but with HC110 you definitely do,
    H
    Well thanks! Yes, the look of "regular" film is what I'd like to get if possible.

    Have you found that N- development is really hard with this film? It seems I can get excellent negatives with normal or low-contrast lighting but even cutting development doesn't seem to really help contract an N- scene.
    Bryan | Blog | YouTube | Instagram | Portfolio
    All comments and thoughtful critique welcome

  7. #897
    Large Format Rocks ImSoNegative's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    McCaysville Georgia
    Posts
    1,617

    Re: Images shot on X-ray film

    Quote Originally Posted by Corran View Post
    Well thanks! Yes, the look of "regular" film is what I'd like to get if possible.

    Have you found that N- development is really hard with this film? It seems I can get excellent negatives with normal or low-contrast lighting but even cutting development doesn't seem to really help contract an N- scene.
    I agree, xray film seems to be in a class all by itself
    "WOW! Now thats a big camera. By the way, how many megapixels is that thing?"

  8. #898

    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Central North Carolina
    Posts
    362

    Re: Images shot on X-ray film

    Quote Originally Posted by Corran View Post
    Well thanks! Yes, the look of "regular" film is what I'd like to get if possible.

    Have you found that N- development is really hard with this film? It seems I can get excellent negatives with normal or low-contrast lighting but even cutting development doesn't seem to really help contract an N- scene.

    I have found to over expose and under develop is the way to get all the shadows to pop. And yes I have just started down the N- path, it does work, but how much and how it works is what I mean to find out.

  9. #899
    Large Format Rocks ImSoNegative's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    McCaysville Georgia
    Posts
    1,617

    Re: Images shot on X-ray film

    Hi Holden, do you develope by inspection or by a certain time? I usually set my timer to about 10 min. I soup in d76 1:4, if the developer is fresh usually after about 4 min. an image will begin to appear, most of the time after around 7 or 8 min I feel like its ready to pull from the dev. d76 is the only dev. i have ever used for xray film. would like to try some rodinal sometime
    "WOW! Now thats a big camera. By the way, how many megapixels is that thing?"

  10. #900

    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Central North Carolina
    Posts
    362

    Re: Images shot on X-ray film

    Most x-ray films developed in about seven minutes and rodinal 1+100. So I expect my developer to work in about seven minutes. But I still look at the results and adjust my times accordingly. So a combination of both approaches. Good luck!

Similar Threads

  1. Technical Pan Film
    By Jehu in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 34
    Last Post: 22-Apr-2016, 18:42
  2. Images, not technical discussions.
    By rdenney in forum Image Sharing (Everything Else) & Discussion
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 23-Jul-2015, 14:16
  3. Replies: 91
    Last Post: 23-Jul-2015, 12:01
  4. T Max 400 Technical Discussion by Sandy King
    By Michael Kadillak in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 38
    Last Post: 7-Feb-2006, 06:08
  5. Discussion: Pyro stain, silver rich film & thick emulsion
    By Pete Caluori in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 22-Nov-2003, 04:39

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •