Page 195 of 655 FirstFirst ... 95145185193194195196197205245295 ... LastLast
Results 1,941 to 1,950 of 6546

Thread: Use of X-ray film: technical discussion with example images

  1. #1941
    Tin Can's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    22,476

    Re: Images shot on X-ray film

    Of course, but I lost track in your explanation.

    Not a criticism, just a restatement.


    Quote Originally Posted by photoevangelist View Post
    Yeah. Isn't 76ml 1:50 for 3.8 liters?
    Tin Can

  2. #1942
    Lee Smathers
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Daegu, South Korea
    Posts
    371

    Re: Images shot on X-ray film

    It's hard to explain things from my phone. Haha.

    If it was criticism that's okay! I kinda miss it. I thrived off of it in grad school.

  3. #1943
    Tin Can's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    22,476

    Re: Images shot on X-ray film

    We are done with Grad school...

    I was told, that one is ready to graduate when you physically throw your advisors out of your studio.

    While it was not that physical, I was definitely done with them.

    No regrets!



    Quote Originally Posted by photoevangelist View Post
    It's hard to explain things from my phone. Haha.

    If it was criticism that's okay! I kinda miss it. I thrived off of it in grad school.
    Tin Can

  4. #1944
    Lee Smathers
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Daegu, South Korea
    Posts
    371

    Re: Images shot on X-ray film

    More from yesterday's developing session: #3 and #4.


    Adams Building #02 by Lee Smathers, on Flickr


    Near Front Gate by Lee Smathers, on Flickr

    Both with 7x17 F&S, 260mm Konica Hexanon GRII, Fuji HR-U (Green Sensitive Xray) @160, in Rodinal 1:50 - developed in trays (3000 ml + 60 ml chemistry), non-stripped, Epson v750 double scanned and stitched.

    Observations:
    • The 260mm Hexanon can cover 7x17 (depending on movements?, or lack there of), but when it misses, it's just by a tiny bit which can be cropped from a scan. It's possible that a professionally made lens board might correct the lens being more centered on the lens board.
    • I may in fact have light leaks in my holders - drats!
    • Love my Rodinal 1:50 dilutions, but I may have to reevaluate the 1:50 for such a large negative. My developing times are around 3min. Trying dilutions of 1:100 or 1:200 should give me the longer times I want to have more consistent development, but at the loss of contrast?
    • May just convert to jobo development and become a stripper myself (look out world!) if the above solution doesn't pan out.

  5. #1945
    Corran's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    North GA Mountains
    Posts
    8,936

    Re: Images shot on X-ray film

    Why is the second one so messed up? The first looks almost perfect.
    Bummer about the light leaks...but they are new? Sounds like something they should be fixing...
    Bryan | Blog | YouTube | Instagram | Portfolio
    All comments and thoughtful critique welcome

  6. #1946
    Lee Smathers
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Daegu, South Korea
    Posts
    371

    Re: Images shot on X-ray film

    Any advice for using PMK with large sheet xray film? (I have Gordon Hutching's book - but haven't read it and it got taken into storage for the summer). I've got enough PMK to play with if it's better than Rodinal. I prefer methods where I won't have to agitate too much.

    I tried it once with HP5+ and wasn't successful:

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	20130211-5x7_7001.jpg 
Views:	72 
Size:	22.9 KB 
ID:	98571
    HP5+ Pyro PMK 1:2:100

  7. #1947
    Lee Smathers
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Daegu, South Korea
    Posts
    371

    Re: Images shot on X-ray film

    Quote Originally Posted by Corran View Post
    Why is the second one so messed up? The first looks almost perfect.
    Bummer about the light leaks...but they are new? Sounds like something they should be fixing...
    For the second one I didn't agitate and I pulled it out of the chemistry at 2 min instead of 3 min. I accidentally exposed the negative at F9 instead of F45. I was trying to develop accordingly... Interestingly we can see that the image circle is most likely the same at F9 and F45.

    Bryan, look at the sky on the far right in the first one. Does that look right? Looks a bit strange to me. I'm not using any lens filters yet.

    Yes, the S&S holders are new.... I would have hoped that they would have been light tight before coming across the Pacific...

  8. #1948
    Corran's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    North GA Mountains
    Posts
    8,936

    Re: Images shot on X-ray film

    I looked at the bigger image on Flickr, and that sky on the right side looks okay to me. It's definitely just blown out a bit as this film commonly does in bright areas. You can burn it in when you wet print but scans get crazy grainy if you try to pull it down. Of course at this size, maybe not!

    You'd be kicking yourself if that was a sheet of Tri-X and you forgot to stop the lens down! Ha!
    Bryan | Blog | YouTube | Instagram | Portfolio
    All comments and thoughtful critique welcome

  9. #1949
    Lee Smathers
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Daegu, South Korea
    Posts
    371

    Re: Images shot on X-ray film

    Quote Originally Posted by Corran View Post
    I looked at the bigger image on Flickr, and that sky on the right side looks okay to me. It's definitely just blown out a bit as this film commonly does in bright areas. You can burn it in when you wet print but scans get crazy grainy if you try to pull it down. Of course at this size, maybe not!

    You'd be kicking yourself if that was a sheet of Tri-X and you forgot to stop the lens down! Ha!
    Thanks for looking, Bryan. How much do you charge for scans? I'm not looking to scan yet, but within a year or so I'm probably going to need to find a better way to get good scans from my Epson v750 via stitching or send it off for drum scans.

    You're absolutely right. I would be drowning myself down with Korean rice wine if it was Kodak film. This box of x-ray was part of two boxes that I scored for free because it expired in 2012. I was kicking myself for not loading more holders.

  10. #1950
    Corran's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    North GA Mountains
    Posts
    8,936

    Re: Images shot on X-ray film

    Yeah...I'm jealous! I'll PM you in a minute RE: scans.
    Bryan | Blog | YouTube | Instagram | Portfolio
    All comments and thoughtful critique welcome

Similar Threads

  1. Technical Pan Film
    By Jehu in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 34
    Last Post: 22-Apr-2016, 18:42
  2. Images, not technical discussions.
    By rdenney in forum Image Sharing (Everything Else) & Discussion
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 23-Jul-2015, 14:16
  3. Replies: 91
    Last Post: 23-Jul-2015, 12:01
  4. T Max 400 Technical Discussion by Sandy King
    By Michael Kadillak in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 38
    Last Post: 7-Feb-2006, 06:08
  5. Discussion: Pyro stain, silver rich film & thick emulsion
    By Pete Caluori in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 22-Nov-2003, 04:39

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •