Page 206 of 655 FirstFirst ... 106156196204205206207208216256306 ... LastLast
Results 2,051 to 2,060 of 6546

Thread: Use of X-ray film: technical discussion with example images

  1. #2051

    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Dallas/Novosibirsk
    Posts
    2,205

    Re: Images shot on X-ray film

    Quote Originally Posted by Randy Moe View Post
    Sergei, now I remember, I forget a lot, put a microswitch on it. Bingo!

    My camera has rear rack and pinion, and front screw focus with a rear crank. It's a really nice 11x14 Process camera, simply gorgeous wood and huge square leather bellows. I got lucky, I saved t from becoming a coffee table!

    I have pics in DIY.

    Thanks!
    Ah, yes, i was following you there I just want to have camera i can take outside of home So huge rolling bed like that is not an option (plus i dont have bits for it). I have some spare things from old cameras though, so i might reuse certain parts, however all the knobs and focusing rails - will have to make those. I am thinking about following Chamonix(Hugo's) idea of just using central rod to do fine focusing and then use friction bit on main rail to do general focusing. Have old Linhof 45s cardan to sacrifice

  2. #2052
    Tin Can's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    22,474

    Re: Images shot on X-ray film

    I have a spare 8x10 Linhof Color Kardan frame I will use for my lens board adaptor. it is big enough and strong enough to let me mount any lens to my studio camera, and I have adapters from that down to the small Linhof boards or Sinar.

    Actually those old Linhof Color Kardans are HD enough to size up quite a bit, they make a Horseman 8x10 seem tinkertoy. I got some ideas there also.


    Quote Originally Posted by SergeiR View Post
    Ah, yes, i was following you there I just want to have camera i can take outside of home So huge rolling bed like that is not an option (plus i dont have bits for it). I have some spare things from old cameras though, so i might reuse certain parts, however all the knobs and focusing rails - will have to make those. I am thinking about following Chamonix(Hugo's) idea of just using central rod to do fine focusing and then use friction bit on main rail to do general focusing. Have old Linhof 45s cardan to sacrifice
    Tin Can

  3. #2053
    Lee Smathers
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Daegu, South Korea
    Posts
    371

    Re: Images shot on X-ray film

    From yesterday's shoot and straight out of the darkroom today:

    Still getting nasty scratches. Processing seems okay except for the top far right corner in Pyro PMK:

    Dalsung Swamp #01 by Lee Smathers, on Flickr

    7x17 Folmer & Shwing, 12" Dagor
    Fuji HR-A (Green Sensitive X-Ray), Pyro PMK 1:2:200 - 15 min in trays
    Double Stitched Epson v750 negative in Photoshop

  4. #2054

    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Dallas/Novosibirsk
    Posts
    2,205

    Re: Images shot on X-ray film

    certainly getting better

  5. #2055
    Lee Smathers
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Daegu, South Korea
    Posts
    371

    Re: Images shot on X-ray film

    Quote Originally Posted by SergeiR View Post
    certainly getting better
    Actually not. Looks like it wasn't the film with problems (except for the spots I was getting - because I don't have those). The problem is me. I just cannot master this tray processing thing! The Rodinal 1:100 images I processed today are looking bad - more unevenness. This is really quite frustrating.

  6. #2056
    Lee Smathers
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Daegu, South Korea
    Posts
    371

    Re: Images shot on X-ray film

    XTOL seems to agree a bit better with me, about the same as Pyro PMK, except I'm getting glove prints and scratches on my PMK.


    Dalsung Swamp #09 by Lee Smathers, on Flickr


    Dalsung Swamp #07 by Lee Smathers, on Flickr


    Dalsung Swamp #03 by Lee Smathers, on Flickr

    7x17 Folmer & Shwing, 12" Dagor
    Fuji HR-A (Green Sensitive X-Ray), XTOL 1:1, 3 min

    Observations: The edges are a bit hot. But something to work towards improving. At this point, I'm not liking ULF and Rodinal in trays.

  7. #2057
    joseph
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Chapel Hill NC
    Posts
    1,401

    Re: Images shot on X-ray film

    Quote Originally Posted by photoevangelist View Post
    XTOL seems to agree a bit better with me, about the same as Pyro PMK, except I'm getting glove prints and scratches on my PMK.


    Dalsung Swamp #09 by Lee Smathers, on Flickr


    Dalsung Swamp #07 by Lee Smathers, on Flickr


    Dalsung Swamp #03 by Lee Smathers, on Flickr

    7x17 Folmer & Shwing, 12" Dagor
    Fuji HR-A (Green Sensitive X-Ray), XTOL 1:1, 3 min

    Observations: The edges are a bit hot. But something to work towards improving. At this point, I'm not liking ULF and Rodinal in trays.

    Perhaps you could try less agitation?

    I've only done one batch, and my setup was pretty crude in a makeshift darkroom, so I'm not without scratches either.

    However, I believe I'm on the right track, for trays at least. Jim's process, using deep tanks, seems the most sensible for this film...

    I don't know what agitation regime you're using, but here's what I've been doing for 11x17.

    4 liters of solution, I have been using D76, 1:3 and 1:5, but have run out of that, and will be trying HC 110 5 litres, 1:100 next. No pre-soak, agitation for the first 20 seconds, then stand for the remainder of the first three minutes. Gently lift film from bottom of the tray (smooth bottomed) and turn over and repeat. This is for a process time of 12 minutes, so I was flipping the film over three times.

    For the next batch, HC110, I plan on only having to flip once, but I need to determine the overall time first, then flip on the halfway point.

    Do you think that the extra density around the edges might be to do with increased development? This semi-stand method might help with that, since the film is lying on the bottom of the tray for long periods, minimizing the effect of fresh developer ingress to the underside.

    I should be doing another batch soon, need to repurpose some space. (Tidy up)

  8. #2058
    joseph
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Chapel Hill NC
    Posts
    1,401

    Re: Images shot on X-ray film

    I also have some 510 Pyro to try, but I think that might be tempting fate just a little too far, without deep tanks...

    Will give it a go when I've shot some fresh tests.

  9. #2059
    Old School Wayne
    Join Date
    Dec 1999
    Posts
    1,255

    Re: Images shot on X-ray film

    Quote Originally Posted by photoevangelist View Post

    7x17 Folmer & Shwing, 12" Dagor
    Fuji HR-A (Green Sensitive X-Ray),
    Do you mean Fuji HR-HA? HR-A doesn't seem to exist in Google.

  10. #2060
    Lee Smathers
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Daegu, South Korea
    Posts
    371

    Re: Images shot on X-ray film

    Quote Originally Posted by jb7 View Post
    Perhaps you could try less agitation?

    I've only done one batch, and my setup was pretty crude in a makeshift darkroom, so I'm not without scratches either.

    However, I believe I'm on the right track, for trays at least. Jim's process, using deep tanks, seems the most sensible for this film...

    I don't know what agitation regime you're using, but here's what I've been doing for 11x17.

    4 liters of solution, I have been using D76, 1:3 and 1:5, but have run out of that, and will be trying HC 110 5 litres, 1:100 next. No pre-soak, agitation for the first 20 seconds, then stand for the remainder of the first three minutes. Gently lift film from bottom of the tray (smooth bottomed) and turn over and repeat. This is for a process time of 12 minutes, so I was flipping the film over three times.

    For the next batch, HC110, I plan on only having to flip once, but I need to determine the overall time first, then flip on the halfway point.

    Do you think that the extra density around the edges might be to do with increased development? This semi-stand method might help with that, since the film is lying on the bottom of the tray for long periods, minimizing the effect of fresh developer ingress to the underside.

    I should be doing another batch soon, need to repurpose some space. (Tidy up)
    ANYTHING I do with Rodinal: 1:50, 1:100, 1:200 - stand, semi-stand, vigorous agitation- all seem to be failures for me with 7x17 in trays. I had it down packed with 8x10 in trays and tanks - same film, different size.

    I don't know what the problem is. I was also using 4 liters.

Similar Threads

  1. Technical Pan Film
    By Jehu in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 34
    Last Post: 22-Apr-2016, 18:42
  2. Images, not technical discussions.
    By rdenney in forum Image Sharing (Everything Else) & Discussion
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 23-Jul-2015, 14:16
  3. Replies: 91
    Last Post: 23-Jul-2015, 12:01
  4. T Max 400 Technical Discussion by Sandy King
    By Michael Kadillak in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 38
    Last Post: 7-Feb-2006, 06:08
  5. Discussion: Pyro stain, silver rich film & thick emulsion
    By Pete Caluori in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 22-Nov-2003, 04:39

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •