Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 12

Thread: Query re S.K.Technika Symmar f:5.6/150 f:12/265

  1. #1

    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Montréal, QC, Canada
    Posts
    72

    Query re S.K.Technika Symmar f:5.6/150 f:12/265

    Hello,

    I want to try out this recently acquired lens on my upcoming two day trip to New Hampshire. What I want to know is which cell to remove in order to have FL 265mm?

    Also, any comments on this particular lens and does "Technika" change anything to the quality.

    Bogdan

    "May the light be with you" ..... whatever that maybe.....

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    8,483

    Re: Query re S.K.Technika Symmar f:5.6/150 f:12/265

    Unscrew the front cell.

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Montréal, QC, Canada
    Posts
    72

    Re: Query re S.K.Technika Symmar f:5.6/150 f:12/265

    Thanks Dan!

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    now in Tucson, AZ
    Posts
    3,631

    Re: Query re S.K.Technika Symmar f:5.6/150 f:12/265

    Linhof was supposed to have tested lenses from their various suppliers and those that passed got the 'Linhof' engraving, or 'Technika' if they were meant for those cameras. Whether the 'Linhof selected' lenses are any better than the lenses sold without the label has been an extremely debatable point for a long time. It's safe to bet that a Linhof-labelled lens will be good enough to use and no worse than a plain one, assuming that it wasn't abused in its earlier life. I've been happy with older Schneider lenses both with and without the Linhof markings, but be aware that the convertible Symmars date roughly from 1955-72 so yours has to be over 40 years old. Schneider said that the converted f.l. was meant mostly for portraiture, meaning unsharp corners, so stop it way down if you want sharp results @ 265mm. Add a yellow filter, too, to cut down on chromatic aberration, but shoot with confidence anyway.

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    1,248

    Re: Query re S.K.Technika Symmar f:5.6/150 f:12/265

    When convertable lenses are "converted" you will find that a LOT more bellows extension than normal is required.
    Real cameras are measured in inches...
    Not pixels.

    www.photocollective.org

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    Greenbank, WA
    Posts
    2,614

    Re: Query re S.K.Technika Symmar f:5.6/150 f:12/265

    Double check the ground glass when stopped down for possible focus shift.

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Barcelona
    Posts
    101

    Re: Query re S.K.Technika Symmar f:5.6/150 f:12/265

    Quote Originally Posted by dsphotog View Post
    When convertable lenses are "converted" you will find that a LOT more bellows extension than normal is required.
    I have purchased one Technika V 5X7 with a matched Symmar 210 mm convertible. Fine for general use, but I would use the 370 mm back lens for portraits.

    I understand that I should use only with B&W film and perhaps a filter too.

    But you say that they need more bellows extension than normal you have some estimates? (I can get 580 mm extension, but.....)

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    3,142

    Re: Query re S.K.Technika Symmar f:5.6/150 f:12/265

    Quote Originally Posted by Delfi_r View Post
    I have purchased one Technika V 5X7 with a matched Symmar 210 mm convertible. Fine for general use, but I would use the 370 mm back lens for portraits.

    I understand that I should use only with B&W film and perhaps a filter too.

    But you say that they need more bellows extension than normal you have some estimates? (I can get 580 mm extension, but.....)
    Well, a 370mm lens needs ~370mm extension to focus at infinity.
    One man's Mede is another man's Persian.

  9. #9

    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Barcelona
    Posts
    101

    Re: Query re S.K.Technika Symmar f:5.6/150 f:12/265

    Yes if the lens is a regular lens, but if the lens is on the back of the lensholder, perhaps I need to adjust my settings

  10. #10
    multiplex
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    local
    Posts
    5,378

    Re: Query re S.K.Technika Symmar f:5.6/150 f:12/265

    Quote Originally Posted by Delfi_r View Post
    I have purchased one Technika V 5X7 with a matched Symmar 210 mm convertible. Fine for general use, but I would use the 370 mm back lens for portraits.

    I understand that I should use only with B&W film and perhaps a filter too.

    But you say that they need more bellows extension than normal you have some estimates? (I can get 580 mm extension, but.....)
    i use mine with a 5x7 camera as well.
    i don't have enough bellows with a toyo ( 4x5 ) with 445 mm extension because the nodal point is so far back.
    so your 500+ seems about right ...
    some folks suggest you can remove the rear cell and it gives a closer infinity distance ( converts to a different focal length )
    .. but i haven't ever done that ...
    have fun
    john

Similar Threads

  1. 80mm Super Symmar XL on Technika
    By Arne Norris in forum Cameras & Camera Accessories
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 12-Aug-2007, 11:17
  2. Does a 210mm Symmar-S fit into a closed Technika IV?
    By Bill_1856 in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 9-Jan-2004, 14:11
  3. 135 Sironar S (or apo symmar)on a Linhof Technika V
    By giancatarina in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 28-May-2001, 10:40

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •