Lens for 8x10 which would you choose. Keep it under $1000 though.
Curiousity has set in after reading what some were saying about the fujinon 250 w 6.7 lens here.
Lens for 8x10 which would you choose. Keep it under $1000 though.
Curiousity has set in after reading what some were saying about the fujinon 250 w 6.7 lens here.
355/9 G-Claron.
Nikon/Nikkor f9 300M.
30cm C.P. Goerz Berlin Dagor.Originally Posted by rkmiec
One man's Mede is another man's Persian.
12" Goerz American Optical Dagor.
Regarding the 250 6,7 Fuji....that is my preferred--my second being my 210 Fuji--for mild/moderate wides and general use
As much as I am liking my new-to-me Fuji W 250/6.7, I would stick with my Fuji W 300/5.6 if I had to choose. I have found the 300 to be a good all-around focal length for my photography.
However, if I went with a light-weight 8x10 instead of my Zone VI (maybe a camera with a single extension -- perhaps non-folding), the 250/6.7 would be a contender. A lot less glass and perhaps it could stay on the camera while walking around.
Normal lens. I currently have a Rodenstock Sironar S. However, I also had a Nikon 300M, which was exactly just as good. The other lens would be a Dagor....
Lenny
EigerStudios
Museum Quality Drum Scanning and Printing
Fuji 360A - though getting one under a K takes some patience, but can be done.
14-inch commercial ektar
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks