Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Zeiss Protar VII vs. Zeiss VII Protarlinse

  1. #1

    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Posts
    336

    Zeiss Protar VII vs. Zeiss VII Protarlinse

    Hi All, I was wondering if the film coverage of the Zeiss Protar VII was similar to the film coverage of the same focal length lens labeled Zeiss VII Protarlinse. In this case a 480mm. And does the film coverage diminish when used in it's convertable form with one element only on the 480mm Protarlinse? Thanks in advance for your input.

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Harbor City, California
    Posts
    1,748

    Zeiss Protar VII vs. Zeiss VII Protarlinse

    They are the same lens design, just different languages. If the same exact focal length, the coverage should be the same. (Apparently Ross made some Protars of somewhat different focal length than did Zeiss and B&L).



    I'm not sure if you are talking about a combination made up of two 480mm cells, or some other arrangement. If it is two 480's, the combination results in a focal length of about 10", or 250mm, and was rated to cover 7" X 9" (roughly 178 X 229mm). A 480mm cell be itself was rated to cover 11" X 14" (about 280 X 356mm).



    Coverage at small apertures would be somewhat greater, though Protar VII's do not increasse coverage on stopping down as do Dagors.

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Posts
    336

    Zeiss Protar VII vs. Zeiss VII Protarlinse

    Thanks Ernest, The elements are 480mm with a 590mm. Any idea of what the coverage of the 590mm alone would be or the 480mm + the 590mm combined?

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Harbor City, California
    Posts
    1,748

    Zeiss Protar VII vs. Zeiss VII Protarlinse

    The 590&480 combination was rated at 8" X 10", roughly 203 X 254mm. The 590 should be on the front. The 590 alone was rated at 12" X 16", roughly 305 X 406mm.

  5. #5

    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Munich
    Posts
    77

    Zeiss Protar VII vs. Zeiss VII Protarlinse

    Emile, this is what my Zeiss list (1938) says: recommended film format for single Protarlinse 1:12.5 fl 59cm is 30x40cm, having an image circle "at small stop" of 77cm; the respective data for your 48cm Protarlinse are 28x34cm and 62cm.

    If you put the two components together you'll have a Doppel-Protar of 31cm focal length, max. aperture 1:7 and an image circle of 48cm ( again "at small stop" which AFAIK means smaller than F/22. A great lens!

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Posts
    336

    Zeiss Protar VII vs. Zeiss VII Protarlinse

    Thanks Uli!

  7. #7

    Zeiss Protar VII vs. Zeiss VII Protarlinse

    Uli, Would you publish the list you mention in your last post.. it would be most interesting

  8. #8

    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Munich
    Posts
    77

    Zeiss Protar VII vs. Zeiss VII Protarlinse

    Richard, my attempts to post the scanned list just failed. If you could send me a mail, I'll attach it - together with a scan of the Protar stop computing dial - to your email address. I am still too much analogue-oriented to manage such dumb digital-world tasks.Uli

Similar Threads

  1. zeiss protar V construction question
    By Victor Samou Wong in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 9-Jan-2006, 00:30
  2. How about is 820mm F/9 Zeiss protar coverage?
    By qiutaolee in forum Cameras & Camera Accessories
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 27-Jun-2005, 02:38
  3. Zeiss, B&L Protar - what focal lengths?
    By Christopher Perez in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 15-Jun-2005, 21:50
  4. Zeiss Protar Lenses
    By Roy Hammans in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 18-Nov-2004, 13:24
  5. Scals of Zeiss Protar aperture
    By Cheng Lu in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 18-Jul-1999, 03:24

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •